EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Influence of Vine Rootstock Type on the Energy Potential of Differentiated Material Obtained from Wine Production

Kamila E. Klimek, Magdalena Kapłan, Grzegorz Maj (), Anna Borkowska and Kamil Buczyński
Additional contact information
Kamila E. Klimek: Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 28 Głęboka St, 20-612 Lublin, Poland
Magdalena Kapłan: Institute of Horticulture Production, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 28 Głęboka St, 20-612 Lublin, Poland
Grzegorz Maj: Department of Power Engineering and Transportation, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 28 Głęboka St, 20-612 Lublin, Poland
Anna Borkowska: Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 28 Głęboka St, 20-612 Lublin, Poland
Kamil Buczyński: Institute of Horticulture Production, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 28 Głęboka St, 20-612 Lublin, Poland

Energies, 2025, vol. 18, issue 19, 1-14

Abstract: In the context of growing demand for renewable energy sources and greenhouse gas emission reductions, increasing attention is being paid to the use of agricultural waste as bioenergy feedstock. The energy potential of biomass in the form of vine stems and pomace from the Regent variety of grapes, grafted onto their own roots and various types of rootstocks (125AA, SO 4 , 161-49), was assessed, where the control group consisted of ungrafted shrubs growing on their own roots, cultivated in south-eastern Poland. The analyses included the determination of technical and elementary parameters, pollutant emission indicators, and exhaust gas composition parameters. Compared to stems, pomace had a higher calorific value, higher C and H content, and lower dust emissions, while at the same time emitting more CO 2 . Stems, on the other hand, showed higher ash content and higher dust emissions, which may limit their energy potential. Among the analysed substrates, pomace from 125AA achieved the highest calorific values at a low moisture content, while biomass from substrate 161-49 was distinguished by the lowest sulphur content and a favourable emission balance. Cluster analysis showed clear grouping of substrates in terms of fuel and emission parameters, indicating the possibility of optimal substrate selection for the production of bioenergy feedstock. The results confirm that the appropriate selection of rootstocks in viticulture can significantly increase the energy value of waste biomass and reduce emissions, supporting the development of local renewable energy systems.

Keywords: energy potential; renewable energy sources; rootstock; post-production waste (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/19/5062/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/19/5062/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:19:p:5062-:d:1756446

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Cassie Shen

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-09-24
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:19:p:5062-:d:1756446