EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Evaluation of Co-Pelletization of Corn Stover and Plastic Waste as an Alternative Fuel Source for Cement Production

Haley Stockham, Asmita Khanal, Sushil Adhikari and Ajay Shah ()
Additional contact information
Haley Stockham: Department of Food, Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Wooster Campus, The Ohio State University, 221 Wooster Science Building, 1680 Madison Ave, Wooster, OH 44691, USA
Asmita Khanal: Department of Food, Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Wooster Campus, The Ohio State University, 221 Wooster Science Building, 1680 Madison Ave, Wooster, OH 44691, USA
Sushil Adhikari: Biosystems Engineering Department, Auburn University, 216 Tom Corley Building, Auburn, AL 36849, USA
Ajay Shah: Department of Food, Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Wooster Campus, The Ohio State University, 221 Wooster Science Building, 1680 Madison Ave, Wooster, OH 44691, USA

Energies, 2025, vol. 18, issue 20, 1-21

Abstract: Corn stover and plastic waste, severely underutilized feedstocks generated in the U.S., could be co-pelletized to produce fuel for cement production. High-density polyethylene bags (0–25% in 5% increments, dry basis) and corn stover were co-pelletized using a flat ring pellet mill with die diameters of 6 and 8 mm. Physical and chemical properties were assessed to determine pellet quality. These results informed techno-economic and life cycle greenhouse gas emissions (GHGe) analyses for a Midwestern plant producing 400,000 metric tons of pellets annually. The system boundary included feedstock acquisition at the pellet plant, size reduction, co-pelletization, and transportation of the pellets to the cement plant by rail. Total resource requirements in terms of raw materials, labor, fuel, equipment, the facility, and utilities were estimated. It was determined that the pellets would be delivered to the cement plant at USD 112.4–138.6/t pellets. The life cycle analysis estimated a total GHGe of 1621.1–1753.1 kg CO 2 e/t pellets associated with the pellet production, transportation, and combustion. The results suggest that substituting 25% of the thermal energy requirement of a cement plant with a 1.1 million t clinker annual production capacity with plastic–stover pellets would reduce the GHGe by 2.8% compared to 100% of the total energy requirement supplied by coal.

Keywords: stover; plastic; pellet; co-pelletization; techno-economic analysis; life cycle assessment; greenhouse gas emissions; cement plant; clinker (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/20/5393/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/20/5393/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:20:p:5393-:d:1770242

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Cassie Shen

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-10-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:20:p:5393-:d:1770242