Comparative Framework for Climate-Responsive Selection of Phase Change Materials in Energy-Efficient Buildings

Javier Martínez-Gómez ()
Additional contact information
Javier Martínez-Gómez: Departamento de Teoría de la Señal y Comunicación, (Área de Ingeniería Mecánica) Escuela Politécnica, Universidad de Alcalá, 28805 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain

Energies, 2025, vol. 18, issue 22, 1-37

Abstract: Integrating phase change materials (PCMs) into buildings and HVAC systems improves thermal comfort and energy efficiency. This study presents a climate-responsive methodology for selecting optimal PCMs using a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework. AHP was employed to determine the relative importance of key thermophysical properties, including melting point (47.5%), latent heat of fusion (25.7%), volumetric latent heat (13.5%), thermal conductivity (6.8%), specific heat capacity (3.3%), and density (3.3%). These weights were applied across five MCDM techniques—COPRAS, VIKOR, TOPSIS, MOORA, and PROMETHEE II—to evaluate 16 PCM alternatives for three representative climate zones: temperate (18 °C), subtropical (23 °C), and tropical hot/desert (28 °C). The results consistently identified n-Heptadecane (C17) as the most suitable PCM for temperate and subtropical climates, while n-Octadecane (C18) and hydrated salts such as CaCl 2 ·6H 2 O and Na 2 CO 3 ·10H 2 O were optimal for tropical zones. Results show that n-Heptadecane (C17) is optimal for temperate and subtropical zones (COPRAS K = 1.00; TOPSIS C = 0.79–0.82; PROMETHEE φ = 0.21–0.22), while n-Octadecane (C18) and hydrated salts such as CaCl 2 ·6H 2 O and Na 2 CO 3 ·10H 2 O perform best in tropical climates (TOPSIS C = 0.85; PROMETHEE φ = 0.26). These PCMs offer high latent heat (up to 254 kJ·kg −1 ) and volumetric storage (up to 381 MJ·m −3 ), enabling significant reductions in HVAC loads and improved indoor temperature stability. The convergence of rankings across methods and alignment with existing literature validate the robustness of the proposed approach. This framework supports informed material selection for sustainable building design and can be adapted to other climate-sensitive engineering applications. The framework introduces methodological innovations by explicitly mapping PCM melting points to climate-specific comfort bands, incorporating volumetric latent heat, and validating rankings through cross-method convergence (Spearman ρ > 0.99). Sensitivity analysis confirms robustness against weight perturbations. The approach supports practical PCM selection for both new and retrofit buildings, contributing to EU and US energy goals (e.g., 40% building energy use, DOE’s 50% reduction target).

Keywords: climate zones; decision-making framework; latent heat storage materials; thermal comfort; energy-efficient buildings; multi-criteria analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/22/5982/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/22/5982/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:22:p:5982-:d:1794741

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Cassie Shen

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().