EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Evaluation of CO 2 Injectivity and Geological Storage Scenarios Using Nodal Analysis and Tubing Injectivity Index in a Depleted Gas Field in Malaysia

Yubin An and Sunil Kwon ()
Additional contact information
Yubin An: Energy and Mineral Resources Engineering, Dong-A University, Busan 49315, Republic of Korea
Sunil Kwon: Energy and Mineral Resources Engineering, Dong-A University, Busan 49315, Republic of Korea

Energies, 2025, vol. 18, issue 22, 1-24

Abstract: This study presents a CO 2 injectivity analysis for the depleted gas field Z offshore Malaysia using nodal analysis and sensitivity analysis. Reservoir permeability was estimated from the appraisal well DST report, which recorded an absolute open flow (AOF) of 253 MMscfd, and sensitivity analyses were conducted for injection pressure, tubing diameter, reservoir pressure, permeability, and thickness. The base-case nodal analysis resulted in an optimal CO 2 injection rate of 52.3 MMscfd. Injection pressure, permeability, and thickness were linearly proportional to injection rate, whereas reservoir pressure showed an inverse relationship. The analysis of injection rate per tubing diameter indicated that 4.548-inch tubing, with 15.11 MMscfd per inch, provided the highest efficiency. A total CO 2 injection volume of 5 Tcf was distributed among five wells, and four injection period scenarios (20, 15, 10, 5 years) were designed based on flow efficiency. In the 5-year scenario, the bottomhole pressure of all wells exceeded the formation parting pressure at a reservoir pressure of approximately 1000 psia, indicating that the target injection rate of 2739 MMscfd could not be achieved. Tubing injectivity index (TII) analysis showed that higher TII values represented greater injection efficiency from a vertical flow perspective.

Keywords: CO 2 geological storage; nodal analysis; injectivity; formation parting pressure; tubing injectivity index (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/22/5983/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/22/5983/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:22:p:5983-:d:1794790

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Cassie Shen

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-11-20
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:22:p:5983-:d:1794790