Internal Model Control for Onboard Methanol-Reforming Hydrogen Production Systems

Fengxiang Chen (), Yuanyuan Duan, Yaowang Pei and Bo Zhang
Additional contact information
Fengxiang Chen: School of Automotive Studies, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
Yuanyuan Duan: School of Automotive Studies, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
Yaowang Pei: School of Automotive Studies, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
Bo Zhang: School of Automotive Studies, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China

Energies, 2025, vol. 18, issue 3, 1-32

Abstract: Methanol reforming is considered to be one of the most promising hydrogen production technologies for hydrogen fuel cells. It is expected to solve the problem of hydrogen storage and transportation because of its high hydrogen production rate, low cost, and good safety. However, the strong nonlinearity and slow response of the pressure and temperature subsystems pose challenges to the tracking control of the methanol reforming hydrogen production system. In this paper, two internal model-based temperature and pressure controllers are proposed, in which the temperature is adjusted by controlling the air flow and the pressure is adjusted by controlling the opening of the back-pressure valve. Firstly, a lumped parameter model of the methanol reforming hydrogen production system is constructed using MATLAB/Simulink ® (produced by MathWorks in Natick, Massachusetts, USA). In addition, the transfer function model of the system is obtained by system identification at the equilibrium point, and the internal model controller is further designed. The simulation results show that the control method achieves the robustness of the system, and the temperature and pressure of the reforming reactor can quickly and accurately track the target value when the load changes. Small-load step tests indicate stable tracking of the temperature and pressure for the reforming reactor, without steady-state errors. Under large-temperature step signal testing, the response time for the reforming temperature is about 148 s, while the large-pressure step signal test shows that the response time for the reforming pressure is about 8 s. Compared to the PID controller, the internal model controller exhibits faster response, zero steady-state error, and no overshoot. The results show that the internal model control method has strong robustness and dynamic characteristics.

Keywords: methanol reforming hydrogen production system; internal model control (IMC); temperature and pressure control; system identification (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/3/476/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/3/476/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:476-:d:1572903

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().