Environmental Assessment of Hybrid Waste-to-Energy System in Ghana

Ekua Afrakoma Armoo (), Theophilus Baidoo, Mutala Mohammed, Francis Boateng Agyenim, Francis Kemausuor and Satyanarayana Narra
Additional contact information
Ekua Afrakoma Armoo: Department of Waste and Resource Management, University of Rostock, 18051 Rostock, Germany
Theophilus Baidoo: Zeal Environmental Technologies, Takoradi P.O. Box TD 1395, Ghana
Mutala Mohammed: Council for Scientific and Industrial Research—Institute of Industrial Research, Accra P.O. Box LG 576, Ghana
Francis Boateng Agyenim: Council for Scientific and Industrial Research—Institute of Industrial Research, Accra P.O. Box LG 576, Ghana
Francis Kemausuor: Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), Kumasi AK-039-5028, Ghana
Satyanarayana Narra: Department of Waste and Resource Management, University of Rostock, 18051 Rostock, Germany

Energies, 2025, vol. 18, issue 3, 1-20

Abstract: Waste management in most parts of Africa is characterized by the disposal of mixed waste in unengineered landfills. The aim of this study is to assess the environmental impact of mixed waste received at a waste-to-energy plant in Ghana relative to the current model of landfilling. A Life Cycle Assessment was conducted using OpenLCA software version 2.3.1 based on the ReCiPe Midpoint method. For landfilling, LandGEM software version 3.03 was used. The results indicate that waste-to-energy has the potential to provide carbon savings of 3.52 tCO 2 eq/ton of waste treated compared to landfilling. Pyrolysis is observed to have high avoided burden across all impact categories, with the lowest Global Warming Potential of −2.3 kgCO 2 eq. Anaerobic digestion shows a near neutral environmental impact with the highest value of 47.56 kg 1,4DCB for Terrestrial Ecotoxicity, while Refuse-Derived Fuel and segregation processes show low environmental burdens. The net avoided burden is highest for global warming and non-carcinogenic human toxicity potential. Overall, the hybrid waste-to-energy model is concluded to be an environmentally preferred waste management option compared to conventional landfilling methods, and we recommend that decision-makers facilitate investments into it. It is also recommended for the development of local inventories and databases to encourage more country-specific environmental impact studies and to reduce uncertainty.

Keywords: life cycle analysis; waste to energy; anaerobic digestion; pyrolysis; refuse derived fuels; environmental impacts; global warming potential; openLCA; LandGEM; Ghana (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/3/595/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/3/595/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:595-:d:1578299

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().