Comparative Study of Different Gases for Packed-Bed Thermal Energy Storage Systems

Ayah Marwan Rabi’, Jovana Radulovic () and James M. Buick
Additional contact information
Ayah Marwan Rabi’: School of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 3DJ, UK
Jovana Radulovic: School of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 3DJ, UK
James M. Buick: School of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 3DJ, UK

Energies, 2025, vol. 18, issue 5, 1-19

Abstract: In recent years, packed-bed systems for large-scale applications have emerged as a highly promising design for Thermal Energy Storage systems because of their high thermal efficiency and economic feasibility. Large-scale application systems typically include packed-bed thermal energy stores as essential components, enabling effective integration with renewable energy and processed heat. The packed-bed systems investigated in this paper utilise Magnesia as the storage medium and optimised parameters, which have previously been identified through research involving charging and discharging cycles of both the hot and cold storage systems when air is the heat transfer fluid. This includes solid particle diameters of 0.004 m, a material porosity of 0.2, an aspect ratio of 1 for the storage tank, and a mass flow rate of 13.7 kg/m 3 . This paper aims to present a comparative analysis of the influence of alternative heat transfer gases, namely air, argon, carbon dioxide, helium, hydrogen, and nitrogen, on the performance of Pumped Thermal Energy Storage hot and cold storage systems. The performance of the six gases in the storage system was evaluated using an axisymmetric model simulated with COMSOL Multiphysics 5.6 software, with the total energy stored and the capacity factor serving as key performance indicators. The results revealed that carbon dioxide gas was the most promising heat transfer fluid and that the packed bed could be operated efficiently over 72% and 76% of its range for hot and cold systems, respectively. Hydrogen, nitrogen, and air performed similarly but less adequately than carbon dioxide and had operating ranges of 55% and 75% for hot and cold storage. Helium and argon had the poorest performance, with optimal charging and discharging rates corresponding to 50% and 66%.

Keywords: packed bed; PTES; thermal energy; capacity factor; thermal power; HTF; performance; COMSOL (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/5/1307/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/5/1307/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:1307-:d:1606869

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().