Climate Neutrality Strategies for the Chemical Industry Using a Novel Carbon Boundary: An Austrian Case Study

Maedeh Rahnama Mobarakeh () and Thomas Kienberger
Additional contact information
Maedeh Rahnama Mobarakeh: Chair of Energy Network Technology, Montanuniversitaet Leoben, Franz-Josef Straße 18, A-8700 Leoben, Austria
Thomas Kienberger: Chair of Energy Network Technology, Montanuniversitaet Leoben, Franz-Josef Straße 18, A-8700 Leoben, Austria

Energies, 2025, vol. 18, issue 6, 1-32

Abstract: The chemical industry is a key driver of economic growth and innovation but remains one of the largest contributors to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Achieving sustainability demands advancements in green chemistry and cleaner production methods. This study investigates emission reduction strategies across Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope 3 by applying both top-down and bottom-up approaches within four system boundaries. The Austrian chemical sector, with a focus on ammonia, methanol, and olefins, serves as a case study. Results highlight the potential of abatement technologies and alternative feedstocks—such as low-carbon hydrogen and methanol—to significantly reduce emissions. Hydrogen-based production for ammonia and methanol, along with low-carbon methanol in olefin production, could reduce Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions by approximately 80% compared to conventional methods. However, Scope 3 emissions remain challenging due to embedded carbon in feedstocks and CO 2 use in production, particularly in product use and end-of-life phases. A comprehensive life cycle assessment is crucial to addressing these impacts. To evaluate Scope 3 emissions, this study explores three decarbonization scenarios: the reference scenario—relies on fossil-based production with high emissions; the geogenic scenario—integrates abatement technologies and geogenic CO 2 feedstock, reducing emissions by about 46%; and the bio-based scenario—combines abatement technologies with biogenic CO 2 feedstock, achieving an 80% reduction in total emissions at the national level. The findings emphasize the need for a system-wide approach that integrates bio-based solutions and circular economy strategies to achieve climate neutrality. However, uncertainties in climate policy, bio-resource availability, and data gaps in Scope 3 emissions must be addressed to ensure effective decarbonization and alignment with climate goals.

Keywords: chemical industry; GHG emission; innovative technology; emission reduction option; decarbonization strategies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/6/1421/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/6/1421/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:6:p:1421-:d:1611317

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().