Multi-Factor Carbon Emissions Prediction in Coal-Fired Power Plants: A Machine Learning Approach for Carbon Footprint Management

Xiaopan Liu, Haonan Yu, Hanzi Liu () and Zhiqiang Sun ()
Additional contact information
Xiaopan Liu: Hunan Engineering Research Center of Clean and Low-Carbon Energy Technology, School of Energy Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
Haonan Yu: Hunan Engineering Research Center of Clean and Low-Carbon Energy Technology, School of Energy Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
Hanzi Liu: Hunan Engineering Research Center of Clean and Low-Carbon Energy Technology, School of Energy Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
Zhiqiang Sun: Hunan Engineering Research Center of Clean and Low-Carbon Energy Technology, School of Energy Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China

Energies, 2025, vol. 18, issue 7, 1-21

Abstract: In coal-fired power plants, accurately accounting for carbon footprints is crucial for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and achieving sustainability goals. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a comprehensive approach that expands the scope of carbon accounting, enabling the calculation of carbon emission data. However, the unclear boundary definition and incomplete data types often lead to insufficient accuracy in model calculations and predictive performance. Herein, we developed machine learning models to predict carbon emissions in a 1000 MW coal-fired power plant. The ElasticNet modeling approach demonstrated exceptional predictive accuracy (R 2 = 0.9514; MAE = 435.42 metric tons CO 2 ). Coal combustion constituted the predominant source of greenhouse gas emissions, with quarterly emissions reaching 1.63 million metric tons in Q1 and 1.11 million metric tons in Q3. Emission intensity exhibited remarkable stability across operational load ranges (1.0–1.1 kg/MWh). Notably, under high-load conditions (>70%), low-calorific-value coal generated marginally higher specific emissions (1.11 kg/MWh) compared to high-calorific-value coal (1.05 kg/MWh). The findings provide rational strategies for optimizing coal procurement strategies and environmental control measures, thereby facilitating an optimal balance between operational efficiency and environmental stewardship.

Keywords: coal-fired plant; carbon footprint; machine learning; life cycle assessment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/7/1715/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/7/1715/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:7:p:1715-:d:1623612

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().