EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Temperature and Humidity Control Optimization Based on Large Language Models (LLMs)

Xuanrong Zhu and Hui Li ()
Additional contact information
Xuanrong Zhu: College of Automation Engineering, Shanghai University of Electric Power, Shanghai 200090, China
Hui Li: College of Automation Engineering, Shanghai University of Electric Power, Shanghai 200090, China

Energies, 2025, vol. 18, issue 7, 1-29

Abstract: Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems primarily consist of pre-cooling air handling units (PAUs), air handling units (AHUs), and air ducts. Existing HVAC control methods, such as Proportional–Integral–Derivative (PID) control or Model Predictive Control (MPC), face limitations in understanding high-level information, handling rare events, and optimizing control decisions. Therefore, to address the various challenges in temperature and humidity control, a more sophisticated control approach is required to make high-level decisions and coordinate the operation of HVAC components. This paper utilizes Large Language Models (LLMs) as a core component for interpreting complex operational scenarios and making high-level decisions. A chain-of-thought mechanism is designed to enable comprehensive reasoning through LLMs, and an algorithm is developed to convert LLM decisions into executable HVAC control commands. This approach leverages adaptive guidance through parameter matrices to seamlessly integrate LLMs with underlying MPC controllers. Simulated experimental results demonstrate that the improved control strategy, optimized through LLM-enhanced Model Predictive Control (MPC), significantly enhances the energy efficiency and stability of HVAC system control. During the summer conditions, energy consumption is reduced by 33.3% compared to the on–off control strategy and by 6.7% relative to the conventional low-level MPC strategy. Additionally, during the system startup phase, energy consumption is slightly reduced by approximately 17.1% compared to the on–off control strategy. Moreover, the proposed method achieves superior temperature stability, with the mean squared error (MSE) reduced by approximately 35% compared to MPC and by 45% relative to on–off control.

Keywords: Large Language Models; HVAC; Model Predictive Control (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/7/1813/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/7/1813/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:7:p:1813-:d:1627627

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-05
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:7:p:1813-:d:1627627