EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation Analysis of Multi-Energy Complementary Off-Grid System Operation

Yu Lei, Xiaobin Yan, Shenhao Yang, Yu Fan, Chao Ma, Qingsong Li, Yuanfeng Huang and Wei Yang ()
Additional contact information
Yu Lei: Energy Planning and Research Institute, Southwest Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd., China Power Engineering Consulting Group, Chengdu 610500, China
Xiaobin Yan: Energy Planning and Research Institute, Southwest Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd., China Power Engineering Consulting Group, Chengdu 610500, China
Shenhao Yang: Energy Planning and Research Institute, Southwest Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd., China Power Engineering Consulting Group, Chengdu 610500, China
Yu Fan: Energy Planning and Research Institute, Southwest Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd., China Power Engineering Consulting Group, Chengdu 610500, China
Chao Ma: Energy Planning and Research Institute, Southwest Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd., China Power Engineering Consulting Group, Chengdu 610500, China
Qingsong Li: School of Electrical and Information, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
Yuanfeng Huang: School of Electrical and Information, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
Wei Yang: School of Electrical and Information, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China

Energies, 2025, vol. 18, issue 9, 1-20

Abstract: In the future, China’s demand for centralized industrial development in remote areas will gradually increase, but the operation evaluation analysis of off-grid systems applicable to the development of such areas has not yet matured, and it is an urgent challenge to improve the operation mechanism of off-grid systems and then conduct a comprehensive benefit evaluation of off-grid systems. First of all, this paper focuses on the problem that the existing dimensions of the benefit evaluation of multi-energy complementary off-grid systems are not refined and comprehensive enough, and takes into account their high safety and reliability requirements, as well as the potential impacts on local industries and people’s lives after their completion, and then constructs a more complete comprehensive benefit evaluation indicator system for multi-energy complementary off-grid systems. Secondly, the subjective and objective weighting method based on the combination of the AHP (analytic hierarchy process) and AEM (anti-entropy method) is used to assign weights to the evaluation indicators. Finally, based on the TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) comprehensive evaluation method, a comprehensive benefit evaluation of a multi-energy complementary off-grid system under different operation schemes is conducted, and the example results show that the size of the relative closeness under different operation schemes has a maximum difference of 0.5592, which verifies that the proposed evaluation indicator system and the multilevel evaluation method can comprehensively evaluate and analyze the strengths and weaknesses of multi-energy complementary off-grid systems under different operation schemes, and provide theoretical guidance and decision-making support for the further promotion and construction of multi-energy complementary off-grid systems.

Keywords: multi-energy complementarity; off-grid systems; benefit evaluation; analytic hierarchy process; subjective and objective weighting method (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/9/2159/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/9/2159/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:2159-:d:1640586

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-05-17
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:2159-:d:1640586