EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Common Reed and Plant-Based Biowaste from Households

Robert Czubaszek and Agnieszka Wysocka-Czubaszek ()
Additional contact information
Robert Czubaszek: Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45A Str., 15-351 Bialystok, Poland
Agnieszka Wysocka-Czubaszek: Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45A Str., 15-351 Bialystok, Poland

Energies, 2025, vol. 18, issue 9, 1-20

Abstract: Organic wastes from households, private gardens, the maintenance of urban greenery, and active nature conservation measures are often difficult to manage. This lignocellulosic biomass may be suitable for anaerobic digestion (AD). However, the mono-digestion of plant material, such as waste from active conservation measures for wetlands, results in a low methane (CH 4 ) yield. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of using common reed silage for co-digestion with plant-based biowaste from households. The specific methane yield (SMY) was determined in biochemical methane potential (BMP) tests performed on biowaste, reed silage, and combinations of reed silage with 10%, 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% of biowaste on a fresh weight basis. The lowest SMY was observed for the mono-digestion of reed silage (160.40 ± 4.09 NL kg VS −1 ), while biowaste had the highest CH 4 yield (284.03 ± 7.03 NL kg VS −1 ). The subsequent addition of biowaste enhanced CH 4 production from 158.57 ± 7.88 NL kg VS −1 (10% of biowaste) to 233.28 ± 11.91 NL kg VS −1 (90% of biowaste). A key advantage of biogas production is its role in reducing CO 2 emissions into the atmosphere, which result from the use of conventional fuels for energy generation. The avoided CO 2 emissions generated in electricity and heat production range between 378.62 kgCO 2 t TS −1 and 676.36 kgCO 2 t TS −1 depending on the reed silage-to-biowaste ratio used for biogas production. This study reveals that reed silage is not an optimal feedstock for biogas production, and its share in co-digestion with biowaste should not exceed 10% of the total input to the biogas plant.

Keywords: clean energy; specific methane yield; greenhouse gas (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/9/2178/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/9/2178/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:2178-:d:1641497

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-05-10
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:2178-:d:1641497