Orderly Charging and Discharging Strategy for Electric Vehicles with Integrated Consideration of User and Distribution Grid Benefits

Yizhe Chen, Yifan Gao, Ruifeng Zhao, Jiangang Lu, Ming Li, Chengzhi Wei and Junhao Li ()
Additional contact information
Yizhe Chen: Zhaoging Power Supply Bureau of Guangdong Power Grid Co., Ltd., Zhaoging 526060, China
Yifan Gao: Zhaoging Power Supply Bureau of Guangdong Power Grid Co., Ltd., Zhaoging 526060, China
Ruifeng Zhao: Power Dispatching Control Center of Guangdong Power Grid Corporation, Guangzhou 510600, China
Jiangang Lu: Power Dispatching Control Center of Guangdong Power Grid Corporation, Guangzhou 510600, China
Ming Li: South China Electric Power Research Institute, Guangzhou 510663, China
Chengzhi Wei: South China Electric Power Research Institute, Guangzhou 510663, China
Junhao Li: National Engineering Research Center for Electrical Energy Conversion and Control, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China

Energies, 2025, vol. 18, issue 9, 1-18

Abstract: With the rapid development of electric vehicles (EVs), vehicle-to-grid has become a common way to participate in grid regulation. However, in the traditional vehicle-to-grid strategy, the disorganized or coercive regulatory characteristics of EVs always affect the overall satisfaction of EV users and the safe and economic operation of the distribution network. It is challenging to balance the interests of road network subjects. For this reason, this paper proposes an orderly charging and discharging strategy for electric vehicles with integrated consideration of user and distribution grid benefits. First, a comprehensive EV user satisfaction model that considers the vehicle owner’s travel costs is established by considering the vehicle’s travel status and the road resistance characteristics of the road network. Further, the EV orderly charging and discharging model is established to optimize the operation cost of the distribution network, voltage deviation, and EV users’ comprehensive satisfaction, which takes into account the vehicle owner’s satisfaction and the stable operation of the distribution network. Finally, the proposed strategy is validated using the IEEE 33-node arithmetic example. The results show that the peak-to-valley load difference of the distribution network under the strategy of this paper is 29.52% lower than that under the EV non-participation regulation strategy. Compared with the EV non-participation strategy, it can effectively reduce the single-day operation cost of the system by 2.47%.

Keywords: electric vehicles; user satisfaction; vehicle-to-grid; voltage deviation; roadblock (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/9/2305/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/9/2305/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:2305-:d:1646947

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().