Implementing Large-Scale CCS in Complex Geologic Reservoirs: Insights from Three Appalachian Basin Case Studies

Joel Sminchak (), Priya Ravi-Ganesh, Randall Hunt, John Hershberger and Brigitte Petras
Additional contact information
Joel Sminchak: Battelle Memorial Research Institute, Columbus, OH 43201, USA
Priya Ravi-Ganesh: Battelle Memorial Research Institute, Columbus, OH 43201, USA
Randall Hunt: Battelle Memorial Research Institute, Columbus, OH 43201, USA
John Hershberger: Battelle Memorial Research Institute, Columbus, OH 43201, USA
Brigitte Petras: Battelle Memorial Research Institute, Columbus, OH 43201, USA

Energies, 2025, vol. 18, issue 9, 1-17

Abstract: This paper presents three design case studies for implementing large-scale geologic carbon storage in the Appalachian Basin region of the midwestern United States. While the Appalachian Basin has a challenging setting for carbon storage, the three case studies detailed in this article demonstrate that there are realistic options for implementing carbon storage in the basin. Carbonate rock formations, depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs, and moderate-porosity sandstones can be utilized as carbon-storage reservoirs in the Appalachian Basin. While these are not typical concepts for CO 2 storage, the storage zones have advantages such as defined trapping mechanisms, multiple caprocks, and defined boundaries that are not always present in thick, permeable sandstones being targeted for many carbon-storage projects. The geologic setting, geotechnical parameters, and hydrologic setting for the three case studies are provided, along with the results of reservoir simulations of the CO 2 injection-deployment strategies. The geological rock formations available for CO 2 storage in the Appalachian Basin are more localized reservoirs with defined boundaries and finite storage capacities. Simulation results showed that accessing carbon-storage resources in these fields may require wellfields with 2–10 injection wells. However, these fields would have the capacity to inject 1–3 million metric tons of CO 2 per year and up to 90 million metric tons of CO 2 in total. The CO 2 storage resources would fulfill decarbonization goals for many of the natural-gas power plants, cement plants, hydrogen plants, and refineries in the Appalachian Basin region.

Keywords: carbon storage; energy storage; geoenergy; hydrogen energy; Appalachian basin; decarbonization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/9/2382/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/9/2382/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:2382-:d:1650445

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().