Tools for Small Hydropower Plant Resource Planning and Development: A Review of Technology and Applications
Petras Punys,
Antanas Dumbrauskas,
Algis Kvaraciejus and
Gitana Vyciene
Additional contact information
Petras Punys: Water and Land Management Faculty of the Lithuanian University of Agriculture, Kaunas, Akademija, 10 Universiteto Str., LT-53361, Lithuania
Antanas Dumbrauskas: Water and Land Management Faculty of the Lithuanian University of Agriculture, Kaunas, Akademija, 10 Universiteto Str., LT-53361, Lithuania
Algis Kvaraciejus: Water and Land Management Faculty of the Lithuanian University of Agriculture, Kaunas, Akademija, 10 Universiteto Str., LT-53361, Lithuania
Gitana Vyciene: Water and Land Management Faculty of the Lithuanian University of Agriculture, Kaunas, Akademija, 10 Universiteto Str., LT-53361, Lithuania
Energies, 2011, vol. 4, issue 9, 1-20
Abstract:
This paper reviews and compares software tools for the planning and design of small hydropower (SHP) plants. The main emphasis is on small scale hydropower resource assessment computer tools and methodologies for the development of SHP plants corresponding to a preliminary or prefeasibility study level. The paper presents a brief evaluation of the historic software tools and the current tools used in the small hydro industry. The reviewed tools vary from simple initial estimates to quite sophisticated software. The integration of assessment tools into Geographic Information System (GIS) environments has led to a leap forward in the strengthening of the evaluation of the power potential of water streams in the case of the spatial variability of different factors affecting stream power. A number of countries (e.g., Canada, Italy, Norway, Scotland and the US) have re-assessed their hydropower capacities based on spatial information of their water stream catchments, developing tools for automated hydro-site identification and deploying GIS-based tools, so-called Atlases, of small-scale hydropower resources on the Internet. However, a reliable assessment of real SHP site feasibility implies some “on the ground” surveying, but this traditional assessment can be greatly facilitated using GIS techniques that involve the spatial variability of catchment characteristics.
Keywords: small hydropower (SHP); GIS; software tools for SHP assessment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (20)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/4/9/1258/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/4/9/1258/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:4:y:2011:i:9:p:1258-1277:d:13730
Access Statistics for this article
Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao
More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().