Methane Production from Gas Hydrate Deposits through Injection of Supercritical CO 2

Christian Deusner, Nikolaus Bigalke, Elke Kossel and Matthias Haeckel
Additional contact information
Christian Deusner: GEOMAR, Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Wischhofstr.1-3, D-24148, Kiel, Germany
Nikolaus Bigalke: GEOMAR, Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Wischhofstr.1-3, D-24148, Kiel, Germany
Elke Kossel: GEOMAR, Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Wischhofstr.1-3, D-24148, Kiel, Germany
Matthias Haeckel: GEOMAR, Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Wischhofstr.1-3, D-24148, Kiel, Germany

Energies, 2012, vol. 5, issue 7, 1-29

Abstract: The recovery of natural gas from CH 4 -hydrate deposits in sub-marine and sub-permafrost environments through injection of CO 2 is considered a suitable strategy towards emission-neutral energy production. This study shows that the injection of hot, supercritical CO 2 is particularly promising. The addition of heat triggers the dissociation of CH 4 -hydrate while the CO 2 , once thermally equilibrated, reacts with the pore water and is retained in the reservoir as immobile CO 2 -hydrate. Furthermore, optimal reservoir conditions of pressure and temperature are constrained. Experiments were conducted in a high-pressure flow-through reactor at different sediment temperatures (2 °C, 8 °C, 10 °C) and hydrostatic pressures (8 MPa, 13 MPa). The efficiency of both, CH 4 production and CO 2 retention is best at 8 °C, 13 MPa. Here, both CO 2 - and CH 4 -hydrate as well as mixed hydrates can form. At 2 °C, the production process was less effective due to congestion of transport pathways through the sediment by rapidly forming CO 2 -hydrate. In contrast, at 10 °C CH 4 production suffered from local increases in permeability and fast breakthrough of the injection fluid, thereby confining the accessibility to the CH 4 pool to only the most prominent fluid channels. Mass and volume balancing of the collected gas and fluid stream identified gas mobilization as equally important process parameter in addition to the rates of methane hydrate dissociation and hydrate conversion. Thus, the combination of heat supply and CO 2 injection in one supercritical phase helps to overcome the mass transfer limitations usually observed in experiments with cold liquid or gaseous CO 2 .

Keywords: gas hydrates; methane; energy; carbon dioxide; CCS (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (19)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/5/7/2112/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/5/7/2112/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:5:y:2012:i:7:p:2112-2140:d:18511

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().