Three-Phase Primary Control for Unbalance Sharing between Distributed Generation Units in a Microgrid

Tine L. Vandoorn, Jeroen D. M. De Kooning, Jan Van de Vyver and Lieven Vandevelde
Additional contact information
Tine L. Vandoorn: Department of Electrical Energy, Systems & Automation, Ghent University, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, 9000 Gent, Belgium
Jeroen D. M. De Kooning: Department of Electrical Energy, Systems & Automation, Ghent University, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, 9000 Gent, Belgium
Jan Van de Vyver: Department of Electrical Energy, Systems & Automation, Ghent University, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, 9000 Gent, Belgium
Lieven Vandevelde: Department of Electrical Energy, Systems & Automation, Ghent University, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, 9000 Gent, Belgium

Energies, 2013, vol. 6, issue 12, 1-22

Abstract: For islanded microgrids, droop-based control concepts have been developed both in single and three-phase variants. The three-phase controllers often assume a balanced network; hence, unbalance sharing and/or mitigation remains a challenging issue. Therefore, in this paper, unbalance is considered in a three-phase islanded microgrid in which the distributed generation (DG) units are operated by the voltage-based droop (VBD) control. For this purpose, the VBD control, which has been developed for single-phase systems, is extended for a three-phase application and an additional control loop is added for unbalance mitigation and sharing. The method is based on an unbalance mitigation scheme by DG units in grid-connected systems, which is altered for usage in grid-forming DG units with droop control. The reaction of the DG units to unbalance is determined by the main parameter of the additional control loop, viz., the distortion damping resistance, R d . The effect of R d on the unbalance mitigation is studied in this paper, i.e., dependent on Rd , the DG units can be resistive for unbalance (RU) or they can contribute in the weakest phase (CW). The paper shows that the RU method decreases the line losses in the system and achieves better power equalization between the DG unit’s phases. However, it leads to a larger voltage unbalance near the loads. The CW method leads to a more uneven power between the DG unit’s phases and larger line losses, but a better voltage quality near the load. However, it can negatively affect the stability of the system. In microgrids with multiple DG units, the distortion damping resistance is set such that the unbalanced load can be shared between multiple DG units in an actively controlled manner rather than being determined by the microgrid configuration solely. The unit with the lowest distortion damping resistance provides relatively more of the unbalanced currents.

Keywords: distributed generation; droop controllers; microgrid; unbalance sharing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/6/12/6586/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/6/12/6586/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:6:y:2013:i:12:p:6586-6607:d:31473

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().