EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A Counter-Current Heat-Exchange Reactor for the Thermal Stimulation of Hydrate-Bearing Sediments

Judith M. Schicks, Erik Spangenberg, Ronny Giese, Manja Luzi-Helbing, Mike Priegnitz and Bettina Beeskow-Strauch
Additional contact information
Judith M. Schicks: Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences Section 4.2, Telegrafenberg, Potsdam 14473, Germany
Erik Spangenberg: Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences Section 4.2, Telegrafenberg, Potsdam 14473, Germany
Ronny Giese: Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences Section 4.2, Telegrafenberg, Potsdam 14473, Germany
Manja Luzi-Helbing: Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences Section 4.2, Telegrafenberg, Potsdam 14473, Germany
Mike Priegnitz: Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences Section 4.2, Telegrafenberg, Potsdam 14473, Germany
Bettina Beeskow-Strauch: Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences Section 4.2, Telegrafenberg, Potsdam 14473, Germany

Energies, 2013, vol. 6, issue 6, 1-15

Abstract: Since huge amounts of CH 4 are bound in natural gas hydrates occurring at active and passive continental margins and in permafrost regions, the production of natural gas from hydrate-bearing sediments has become of more and more interest. Three different methods to destabilize hydrates and release the CH 4 gas are discussed in principle: thermal stimulation, depressurization and chemical stimulation. This study focusses on the thermal stimulation using a counter-current heat-exchange reactor for the in situ combustion of CH 4 . The principle of in situ combustion as a method for thermal stimulation of hydrate bearing sediments has been introduced and discussed earlier [1,2]. In this study we present the first results of several tests performed in a pilot plant scale using a counter-current heat-exchange reactor. The heat of the flameless, catalytic oxidation of CH 4 was used for the decomposition of hydrates in sand within a LArge Reservoir Simulator (LARS). Different catalysts were tested, varying from diverse elements of the platinum group to a universal metal catalyst. The results show differences regarding the conversion rate of CH 4 to CO 2 . The promising results of the latest reactor test, for which LARS was filled with sand and ca. 80% of the pore space was saturated with CH 4 hydrate, are also presented in this study. The data analysis showed that about 15% of the CH 4 gas released from hydrates would have to be used for the successful dissociation of all hydrates in the sediment using thermal stimulation via in situ combustion.

Keywords: thermal stimulation; in situ combustion; gas production; counter-current heat-exchange reactor (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (22)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/6/6/3002/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/6/6/3002/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:6:y:2013:i:6:p:3002-3016:d:26513

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:6:y:2013:i:6:p:3002-3016:d:26513