Effects of Organic Loading Rate on the Performance of a Pressurized Anaerobic Filter in Two-Phase Anaerobic Digestion

Yuling Chen, Benjamin Rößler, Simon Zielonka, Anna-Maria Wonneberger and Andreas Lemmer
Additional contact information
Yuling Chen: State Institute of Agricultural Engineering and Bioenergy, University of Hohenheim, Garbenstraße 9, D-70599 Stuttgart, Germany
Benjamin Rößler: State Institute of Agricultural Engineering and Bioenergy, University of Hohenheim, Garbenstraße 9, D-70599 Stuttgart, Germany
Simon Zielonka: State Institute of Agricultural Engineering and Bioenergy, University of Hohenheim, Garbenstraße 9, D-70599 Stuttgart, Germany
Anna-Maria Wonneberger: DVGW—Research Center at the Engler-Bunte-Institut, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Engler-Bunte-Ring 1, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
Andreas Lemmer: State Institute of Agricultural Engineering and Bioenergy, University of Hohenheim, Garbenstraße 9, D-70599 Stuttgart, Germany

Energies, 2014, vol. 7, issue 2, 1-15

Abstract: The effect of organic loading rate (OLR) on a pressurized anaerobic filter was studied in a laboratory two-phase anaerobic digestion system. The anaerobic filter was operated successively at two working pressures (9 bar and 1.5 bar). The OLR (COD) for each pressure was increased from 5 to 17.5 kg·m ?3 ·day ?1 . The best performance of the reactor at 9 bar was observed at OLR (COD) of 12.5 kg·m ?3 ·day ?1 and hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 1.8 day, with specific biogas productivity (SBP) of 5.3 L·L ?1 ·day ?1 and COD degradation grade of 90.6%. At higher OLRs and shorter HRTs, the process became unstable. In contrast, there was no indication of digester failure during the experiments at 1.5 bar. The SBP peaked at OLR (COD) of 17.5 kg·m ?3 ·day ?1 with 8.2 L·L ?1 ·day ?1 , where COD degradation grade was 90.4%. The biogas collected from the reactor at 9 bar and 1.5 bar contained approximately 74.5% CH 4 and 66.2% CH 4 , respectively, regardless of OLR variation. At OLR (COD) of 5–12.5 kg·m ?3 ·day ?1 , the reactor at 9 bar had the same specific methane yield as at 1.5 bar, which was in the range of 0.31–0.32 L N ·g ?1 COD. Raising the working pressure in the reactor resulted in an increase of methane content of the produced biogas. However, the low pH value (approximately 6.5) inside the reactor, induced by high CO 2 partial pressure seemed to limit the reactor performance at high OLRs and short HRT.

Keywords: two-phase anaerobic digestion; high-pressure fermentation; anaerobic filter; biogas purification; biogas upgrading; anaerobic digestion (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/7/2/736/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/7/2/736/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:7:y:2014:i:2:p:736-750:d:32894

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().