Comparison between Underground Cable and Overhead Line for a Low-Voltage Direct Current Distribution Network Serving Communication Repeater

Jae-Han Kim, Ju-Yong Kim, Jin-Tae Cho, Il-Keun Song, Bo-Min Kweon, Il-Yop Chung and Joon-Ho Choi
Additional contact information
Jae-Han Kim: Korea Electric Power Research Institute (KEPRI), 105 Munji-Ro, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon 305-760, Korea
Ju-Yong Kim: Korea Electric Power Research Institute (KEPRI), 105 Munji-Ro, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon 305-760, Korea
Jin-Tae Cho: Korea Electric Power Research Institute (KEPRI), 105 Munji-Ro, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon 305-760, Korea
Il-Keun Song: Korea Electric Power Research Institute (KEPRI), 105 Munji-Ro, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon 305-760, Korea
Bo-Min Kweon: Department of Electrical Engineering, Kookmin University, Jeongneung-Ro, Seongbuk-Gu, Seoul 136-702, Korea
Il-Yop Chung: Department of Electrical Engineering, Kookmin University, Jeongneung-Ro, Seongbuk-Gu, Seoul 136-702, Korea
Joon-Ho Choi: Department of Electrical Engineering, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 500-757, Korea

Energies, 2014, vol. 7, issue 3, 1-17

Abstract: This paper compares the differences in economic feasibility and dynamic characteristics between underground (U/G) cable and overhead (O/H) line for low-voltage direct current (LVDC) distribution. Numerous low loaded long-distance distribution networks served by medium-voltage alternative current (MVAC) distribution lines exist in the Korean distribution network. This is an unavoidable choice to compensate voltage drop, therefore, excessive cost is expended for the amount of electrical power load. The Korean Electric Power Corporation (KEPCO) is consequently seeking a solution to replace the MVAC distribution line with a LVDC distribution line, reducing costs and providing better quality direct current (DC) electricity. A LVDC distribution network can be installed with U/G cables or O/H lines. In this paper, a realistic MVAC distribution network in a mountainous area was selected as the target model to replace with LVDC. A 30 year net present value (NPV) analysis of the economic feasibility was conducted to compare the cost of the two types of distribution line. A simulation study compared the results of the DC line fault with the power system computer aided design/electro-magnetic transient direct current (PSCAD/EMTDC). The economic feasibility evaluation and simulation study results will be used to select the applicable type of LVDC distribution network.

Keywords: low-voltage direct current (LVDC); distribution network; net present value (NPV) analysis; communication repeater; power converter (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/7/3/1656/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/7/3/1656/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:7:y:2014:i:3:p:1656-1672:d:34250

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().