EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Refined Diebold-Mariano Test Methods for the Evaluation of Wind Power Forecasting Models

Hao Chen, Qiulan Wan and Yurong Wang
Additional contact information
Hao Chen: School of Electrical Engineering, Southeast University, No.2 Sipailou, Nanjing 210096, China
Qiulan Wan: School of Electrical Engineering, Southeast University, No.2 Sipailou, Nanjing 210096, China
Yurong Wang: School of Electrical Engineering, Southeast University, No.2 Sipailou, Nanjing 210096, China

Energies, 2014, vol. 7, issue 7, 1-14

Abstract: The scientific evaluation methodology for the forecast accuracy of wind power forecasting models is an important issue in the domain of wind power forecasting. However, traditional forecast evaluation criteria, such as Mean Squared Error (MSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE), have limitations in application to some degree. In this paper, a modern evaluation criterion, the Diebold-Mariano (DM) test, is introduced. The DM test can discriminate the significant differences of forecasting accuracy between different models based on the scheme of quantitative analysis. Furthermore, the augmented DM test with rolling windows approach is proposed to give a more strict forecasting evaluation. By extending the loss function to an asymmetric structure, the asymmetric DM test is proposed. Case study indicates that the evaluation criteria based on DM test can relieve the influence of random sample disturbance. Moreover, the proposed augmented DM test can provide more evidence when the cost of changing models is expensive, and the proposed asymmetric DM test can add in the asymmetric factor, and provide practical evaluation of wind power forecasting models. It is concluded that the two refined DM tests can provide reference to the comprehensive evaluation for wind power forecasting models.

Keywords: wind power forecasting evaluation; loss function; Diebold-Mariano (DM) test; augmented DM test; asymmetric DM test; evaluation criteria (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (19)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/7/7/4185/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/7/7/4185/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:7:y:2014:i:7:p:4185-4198:d:37677

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:7:y:2014:i:7:p:4185-4198:d:37677