Impact of Air Tightness on the Evaluation of Building Energy Performance in Lithuania

Jolanta Šadauskienė, Valdas Paukštys, Lina Šeduikytė and Karolis Banionis
Additional contact information
Jolanta Šadauskienė: Institute of Architecture and Construction, Kaunas University of Technology, Tunelio st. 60, LT-44405 Kaunas, Lithuania
Valdas Paukštys: Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Kaunas University of Technology, Studentų st. 48, LT-51367 Kaunas, Lithuania
Lina Šeduikytė: Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Kaunas University of Technology, Studentų st. 48, LT-51367 Kaunas, Lithuania
Karolis Banionis: Institute of Architecture and Construction, Kaunas University of Technology, Tunelio st. 60, LT-44405 Kaunas, Lithuania

Energies, 2014, vol. 7, issue 8, 1-16

Abstract: In order to fulfil the European Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) requirements for the reduction of energy consumption, European national requirements have been created for building envelope thermal properties and calculation methodology to determine if building energy efficiency is created. This is however not true in all methodologies. The necessity of building air tightness appears only for new A class buildings, and there are no requirements for air tightness for other building classes. Therefore, the aim of this work is to improve the methodology for the calculation of energy efficiency of buildings, while taking into account the air tightness of the buildings. In order to achieve this aim, the sum energy consumption of investigated buildings was calculated, energy efficiency classes were determined, air tightness of the buildings was measured, and reasons for insufficient air tightness were analyzed. Investigation results show that the average value of air tightness of A energy efficiency class buildings is 0.6 h ?1 . The results of other investigated buildings, corresponding to B and C energy efficiency classes, show insufficient air tightness (the average n 50 value is 6 h ?1 ); herewith, energy consumption for heating is higher than calculated, according to the energy efficiency methodology. This paper provides an energy performance evaluation scheme, under which performed evaluation of energy performance of buildings ensures high quality construction work, building durability, and the reliability of heat-loss calculations.

Keywords: infiltration; blower door; air tightness; energy; building (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/7/8/4972/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/7/8/4972/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:7:y:2014:i:8:p:4972-4987:d:38795

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().