EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A Double-Weighted Bankruptcy Method to Allocate CO 2 Emissions Permits

Stefano Moretti and Raja Trabelsi
Additional contact information
Stefano Moretti: LAMSADE, CNRS, Université Paris-Dauphine, Université PSL, 75016 Paris, France
Raja Trabelsi: LAMSADE, CNRS, Université Paris-Dauphine, Université PSL, 75016 Paris, France

Games, 2021, vol. 12, issue 4, 1-21

Abstract: Global warming, as a result of greenhouse gases, is exceeding the planet’s temperature stabilization capacities. Thus, greenhouse gas emissions must be reduced. We analyse a bankruptcy situation aimed at allocating emissions permits of CO 2 , the predominant greenhouse gas emitted by human activities. Inspired by the Constrained Equal Awards (CEA) solution for bankruptcy situations, we introduce a new allocation protocol based on the extension of the CEA solution over double-weighted bankruptcy situations, including two exogenous parameters aimed at providing a balance, in the request of emissions permits, between economic activities and the production of renewable energy. In these bi-criteria allocation problems, we focus on a computational approach to find an allocation protocol that does not prioritize any particular parameter. As an application of our method, we first consider CO 2 permit allocation problems in European Union (EU) countries, using real data about the gross domestic product (GDP), the production rate of renewable energies, and countries’ ‘demands’ of CO 2 emissions from 2010 to 2014. Then, we compare our approach with the CEA solution and its single-weighted extension to show the impact of using two weights over the distribution of CO 2 emissions permits; we analyse the correlation between allocations of CO 2 emission permits and the distribution of power within the EU Council to study the acceptability of alternative allocations.

Keywords: bankruptcy situations; CO 2 emissions permits; double-weighted allocation protocol (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C C7 C70 C71 C72 C73 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/12/4/78/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/12/4/78/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jgames:v:12:y:2021:i:4:p:78-:d:662996

Access Statistics for this article

Games is currently edited by Ms. Susie Huang

More articles in Games from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jgames:v:12:y:2021:i:4:p:78-:d:662996