Economics at your fingertips  

Does Implicit Bias Predict Dictator Giving?

Daniel Lee ()

Games, 2018, vol. 9, issue 4, 1-19

Abstract: Implicit associations and biases are carried without awareness or conscious direction, yet there is reason to believe they may be influenced by social pressures. In this paper, I study social pressure as a motive to give, as well as giving itself under conditions of implicit bias. In doing so, I pair the Implicit Association Test (IAT), commonplace in other social sciences, with a laboratory dictator game with sorting. I find that despite its popularity, the IAT does not predict dictator giving and social pressure does not explain acts of giving from biased dictators. These results are indicative of the meaningful difference between having an implicit bias and acting on one. As such, results can be thought of as a bound on the external validity of the IAT.

Keywords: IAT; implicit bias; race; prosocial behavior; social pressures (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C C7 C70 C71 C72 C73 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) (application/pdf) (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Access Statistics for this article

Games is currently edited by Prof. Dr. Ulrich Berger

More articles in Games from MDPI, Open Access Journal
Bibliographic data for series maintained by XML Conversion Team ().

Page updated 2019-09-08
Handle: RePEc:gam:jgames:v:9:y:2018:i:4:p:73-:d:171360