Spatial Distribution of Cosmetic-Procedure Businesses in Two U.S. Cities: A Pilot Mapping and Validation Study

S. Bryn Austin, Allegra R. Gordon, Grace A. Kennedy, Kendrin R. Sonneville, Jeffrey Blossom and Emily A. Blood
Additional contact information
S. Bryn Austin: Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, 333 Longwood Ave., #634, Boston, MA 02115, USA
Allegra R. Gordon: Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
Grace A. Kennedy: Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, 333 Longwood Ave., #634, Boston, MA 02115, USA
Kendrin R. Sonneville: Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, 333 Longwood Ave., #634, Boston, MA 02115, USA
Jeffrey Blossom: Center for Geographic Analysis, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
Emily A. Blood: Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, 333 Longwood Ave., #634, Boston, MA 02115, USA

IJERPH, 2013, vol. 10, issue 12, 1-31

Abstract: Cosmetic procedures have proliferated rapidly over the past few decades, with over $11 billion spent on cosmetic surgeries and other minimally invasive procedures and another $2.9 billion spent on U.V. indoor tanning in 2012 in the United States alone. While research interest is increasing in tandem with the growth of the industry, methods have yet to be developed to identify and geographically locate the myriad types of businesses purveying cosmetic procedures. Geographic location of cosmetic-procedure businesses is a critical element in understanding the public health impact of this industry; however no studies we are aware of have developed valid and feasible methods for spatial analyses of these types of businesses. The aim of this pilot validation study was to establish the feasibility of identifying businesses offering surgical and minimally invasive cosmetic procedures and to characterize the spatial distribution of these businesses. We developed and tested three methods for creating a geocoded list of cosmetic-procedure businesses in Boston (MA) and Seattle (WA), USA, comparing each method on sensitivity and staff time required per confirmed cosmetic-procedure business. Methods varied substantially. Our findings represent an important step toward enabling rigorous health-linked spatial analyses of the health implications of this little-understood industry.

Keywords: cosmetic surgery; cosmetic procedure; U.V. indoor tanning; small-area estimation; NAICS code (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/10/12/6832/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/10/12/6832/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:10:y:2013:i:12:p:6832-6862:d:31118

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().