Using Inequality Measures to Incorporate Environmental Justice into Regulatory Analyses

Sam Harper, Eric Ruder, Henry A. Roman, Amelia Geggel, Onyemaechi Nweke, Devon Payne-Sturges and Jonathan I. Levy
Additional contact information
Sam Harper: Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics & Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1A2, Canada
Eric Ruder: Industrial Economics, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02140, USA
Henry A. Roman: Industrial Economics, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02140, USA
Amelia Geggel: Industrial Economics, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02140, USA
Onyemaechi Nweke: Office of Environmental Justice, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460, USA
Devon Payne-Sturges: National Center for Environmental Research, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460, USA
Jonathan I. Levy: Department of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118, USA

IJERPH, 2013, vol. 10, issue 9, 1-21

Abstract: Formally evaluating how specific policy measures influence environmental justice is challenging, especially in the context of regulatory analyses in which quantitative comparisons are the norm. However, there is a large literature on developing and applying quantitative measures of health inequality in other settings, and these measures may be applicable to environmental regulatory analyses. In this paper, we provide information to assist policy decision makers in determining the viability of using measures of health inequality in the context of environmental regulatory analyses. We conclude that quantification of the distribution of inequalities in health outcomes across social groups of concern, considering both within-group and between-group comparisons, would be consistent with both the structure of regulatory analysis and the core definition of environmental justice. Appropriate application of inequality indicators requires thorough characterization of the baseline distribution of exposures and risks, leveraging data generally available within regulatory analyses. Multiple inequality indicators may be applicable to regulatory analyses, and the choice among indicators should be based on explicit value judgments regarding the dimensions of environmental justice of greatest interest.

Keywords: regulatory analysis; health inequalities; environmental justice (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/10/9/4039/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/10/9/4039/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:10:y:2013:i:9:p:4039-4059:d:28442

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().