Economics of Obesity — Learning from the Past to Contribute to a Better Future

Jaithri Ananthapavan, Gary Sacks, Marj Moodie and Rob Carter
Additional contact information
Jaithri Ananthapavan: Deakin Health Economics, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia
Gary Sacks: WHO Collaborating Centre for Obesity Prevention, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia
Marj Moodie: Deakin Health Economics, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia
Rob Carter: Deakin Health Economics, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia

IJERPH, 2014, vol. 11, issue 4, 1-19

Abstract: The discipline of economics plays a varied role in informing the understanding of the problem of obesity and the impact of different interventions aimed at addressing it. This paper discusses the causes of the obesity epidemic from an economics perspective, and outlines various justifications for government intervention in this area. The paper then focuses on the potential contribution of health economics in supporting resource allocation decision making for obesity prevention/treatment. Although economic evaluations of single interventions provide useful information, evaluations undertaken as part of a priority setting exercise provide the greatest scope for influencing decision making. A review of several priority setting examples in obesity prevention/treatment indicates that policy (as compared with program-based) interventions, targeted at prevention (as compared with treatment) and focused “upstream” on the food environment, are likely to be the most cost-effective options for change. However, in order to further support decision makers, several methodological advances are required. These include the incorporation of intervention costs/benefits outside the health sector, the addressing of equity impacts, and the increased engagement of decision makers in the priority setting process.

Keywords: obesity; prevention; economic evaluation; priority setting; interventions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/4/4007/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/4/4007/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:11:y:2014:i:4:p:4007-4025:d:35055

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().