Brand Cigarillos — A Cheap and Less Harmful Alternative to Cigarettes? Particulate Matter Emissions Suggest Otherwise

Alexander Gerber, Alexander Bigelow, Michaela Schulze and David A. Groneberg
Additional contact information
Alexander Gerber: Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Haus 9b, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Alexander Bigelow: Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Haus 9b, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Michaela Schulze: Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Haus 9b, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
David A. Groneberg: Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Haus 9b, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany

IJERPH, 2015, vol. 12, issue 1, 1-11

Abstract: Background : Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS)-associated particulate matter (PM) constitutes a considerable health risk for passive smokers. It ought to be assessed separately from the other known toxic compounds of tobacco smoke. Brand-specific differences between cigarettes and particularly between cigarettes and favorably taxed cigarillos, are of public interest and therefore worth being investigated. Methods : An automatic environmental tobacco smoke emitter (AETSE) was developed to generate cigarette and cigarillo smoke in a reliable and reproducible way. John Player Special (JPS) Red cigarettes, JPS filter cigarillos and 3R4F standard research cigarettes were smoked automatically in a 2.88 m 3 glass chamber according to a standardized protocol until 5 cm from the top were burned down. Results : Mean concentrations (C mean ) and area of the curve (AUC) of PM 2.5 were measured and compared. C mean PM 2.5 were found to be 804 µg/m 3 for 3R4F reference cigarettes, 1633 µg/m 3 for JPS cigarettes, and 1059 µg/m 3 for JPS filter cigarillos. AUC PM 2.5 -values are 433,873 µg/m 3 ×s for 3R4F reference cigarettes, 534,267 µg/m 3 ×s for JPS Red cigarettes and 782,850 µg/m 3 ×s for JPS filter cigarillos. Conclusion : Potential brand-specific differences of ETS-associated PM emissions among brands of cigarettes, and between cigarettes and cigarillos of the same brand and size should be investigated and published. Information about relative PM-emissions should be printed on the package.

Keywords: particulate matter; tobacco; smoke; cigarette; cigarillo (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/1/428/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/1/428/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:1:p:428-438:d:44265

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().