EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Variations in Label Information and Nicotine Levels in Electronic Cigarette Refill Liquids in South Korea: Regulation Challenges

Sungroul Kim, Maciej L. Goniewicz, Sol Yu, Bokyeong Kim and Ribhav Gupta
Additional contact information
Sungroul Kim: Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Soonchunhyang University, Asan-city 336-745, South Korea
Maciej L. Goniewicz: Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Department of Health Behaviors, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
Sol Yu: Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Soonchunhyang University, Asan-city 336-745, South Korea
Bokyeong Kim: Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Soonchunhyang University, Asan-city 336-745, South Korea
Ribhav Gupta: Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Department of Health Behaviors, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA

IJERPH, 2015, vol. 12, issue 5, 1-10

Abstract: Background: In South Korea, the consumption of liquid nicotine used in electronic cigarettes has dramatically increased from 4310 L in 2012 to 7220 L in 2013. This study aimed to examine the level of heterogeneity of contents of the labels and discrepancy of the nicotine content between that indicated on the label and the actual values for electronic cigarette liquid refill products in South Korea. Methods: We purchased 32 electronic cigarette liquid refill products (17 Korean domestic, 15 imported ones) and one pure nicotine product at six different electronic cigarette retail stores in Seoul between May and June 2014. The actual nicotine concentrations of each product were measured by a blinded analyst at Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA. Results: Three out of 15 imported liquid refill products provided manufacturing dates, while expiration dates were available on eight products. The range of nicotine concentration was from “not detected” to 17.5 mg/mL. Labeling discrepancies of the concentrations ranged from ?32.2% to 3.3% among electronic cigarette liquid refill products. The highest concentration (150.3 ± 7.9 mg/mL) was found in a sample labeled as “pure nicotine”. Conclusions: There is no standardization of labelling among electronic cigarette liquids sampled from retail stores and the labels did not accurately reflect the content. One product labeled “pure nicotine” raises concerns, since it may be poisonous to consumers, especially to children. This study revealed the urgent need for the development of product regulations in South Korea.

Keywords: electronic cigarettes; labels; nicotine; regulation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/5/4859/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/5/4859/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:5:p:4859-4868:d:49143

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:5:p:4859-4868:d:49143