Identification of Response Options to Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining (ASGM) in Ghana via the Delphi Process

Avik Basu, Sean Phipps, Rachel Long, George Essegbey and Niladri Basu
Additional contact information
Avik Basu: School of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
Sean Phipps: Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, McGill University, CINE Building Macdonald Campus of McGill University, 21111 Lakeshore Rd., Ste. Anne de Bellevue, QC H9X 3V9, Canada
Rachel Long: Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
George Essegbey: Science and Technology Policy Research Institute, CSIR-STEPRI, P.O. Box CT. 519, Cantonments, Accra, Ghana
Niladri Basu: Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, McGill University, CINE Building Macdonald Campus of McGill University, 21111 Lakeshore Rd., Ste. Anne de Bellevue, QC H9X 3V9, Canada

IJERPH, 2015, vol. 12, issue 9, 1-19

Abstract: The Delphi technique is a means of facilitating discussion among experts in order to develop consensus, and can be used for policy formulation. This article describes a modified Delphi approach in which 27 multi-disciplinary academics and 22 stakeholders from Ghana and North America were polled about ways to address negative effects of small-scale gold mining (ASGM) in Ghana. In early 2014, the academics, working in disciplinary groups, synthesized 17 response options based on data aggregated during an Integrated Assessment of ASGM in Ghana. The researchers participated in two rounds of Delphi polling in March and April 2014, during which 17 options were condensed into 12. Response options were rated via a 4-point Likert scale in terms of benefit (economic, environmental, and benefit to people) and feasibility (economic, social/cultural, political, and implementation). The six highest-scoring options populated a third Delphi poll, which 22 stakeholders from diverse sectors completed in April 2015. The academics and stakeholders also prioritized the response options using ranking exercises. The technique successfully gauged expert opinion on ASGM, and helped identify potential responses, policies and solutions for the sector. This is timely given that improvement to the ASGM sector is an important component within the UN Minamata Convention.

Keywords: Delphi technique; Ghana; small-scale gold mining; policy development; consensus; questionnaires; survey method (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/9/11345/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/9/11345/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:9:p:11345-11363:d:55560

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().