Are Non-Pharmacological Interventions Effective in Reducing Drug Use and Criminality? A Systematic and Meta-Analytical Review with an Economic Appraisal of These Interventions
Amanda E. Perry,
Rebecca Woodhouse,
Matthew Neilson,
Marrissa Martyn St James,
Julie Glanville,
Catherine Hewitt and
Dominic Trépel
Additional contact information
Amanda E. Perry: Department of Health Sciences, Mental Health and Addictions Research Group, ARRC Building, 2nd Floor, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK
Rebecca Woodhouse: Department of Health Sciences, Mental Health and Addictions Research Group, ARRC Building, 2nd Floor, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK
Matthew Neilson: Department of Health Sciences, Mental Health and Addictions Research Group, ARRC Building, 2nd Floor, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK
Marrissa Martyn St James: Health Economics and Decision Science, School for Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK
Julie Glanville: York Health Economics Consortium Ltd., Enterprise House, Innovation Way, University of York, York YO10 5NQ, UK
Catherine Hewitt: York Trials Unit and NIHR RDS YH, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, ARRC Building, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK
Dominic Trépel: Department of Health Sciences, Mental Health and Addictions Research Group, ARRC Building, 2nd Floor, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK
IJERPH, 2016, vol. 13, issue 10, 1-20
Abstract:
Background: The numbers of incarcerated people suffering from drug dependence has steadily risen since the 1980s and only a small proportion of these receive appropriate treatment. A systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness and economic evidence of non-pharmacological interventions for drug using offenders was conducted. Methods: Cochrane Collaboration criteria were used to identify trials across 14 databases between 2004 and 2014. A series of meta-analyses and an economic appraisal were conducted. Results : 43 trials were identified showing to have limited effect in reducing re-arrests RR 0.97 (95% CI 0.89–1.07) and drug use RR 0.90 (95% CI 0.80–1.00) but were found to significantly reduce re-incarceration RR 0.70 (95% CI 0.57–0.85). Therapeutic community programs were found to significantly reduce the number of re-arrests RR 0.70 (95% CI 0.56–0.87). 10 papers contained economic information. One paper presented a cost-benefit analysis and two reported on the cost and cost effectiveness of the intervention. Conclusions: We suggest that therapeutic community interventions have some benefit in reducing subsequent re-arrest. We recommend that economic evaluations should form part of standard trial protocols.
Keywords: systematic review; drug treatment; economic appraisal; offenders (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/10/966/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/10/966/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:10:p:966-:d:79515
Access Statistics for this article
IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu
More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().