EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Childhood Fish Consumption and Learning and Behavioral Disorders

Jenny L. Carwile, Lindsey J. Butler, Patricia A. Janulewicz, Michael R. Winter and Ann Aschengrau
Additional contact information
Jenny L. Carwile: Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118, USA
Lindsey J. Butler: Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118, USA
Patricia A. Janulewicz: Department of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118, USA
Michael R. Winter: Data Coordinating Center, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118, USA
Ann Aschengrau: Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118, USA

IJERPH, 2016, vol. 13, issue 11, 1-15

Abstract: Fish is a major source of nutrients critical for brain development during early life. The importance of childhood fish consumption is supported by several studies reporting associations of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (n-3 PUFA) supplementation with better behavior and school performance. However, fish may have a different effect than n-3 PUFA alone due to the neurotoxic effects of methylmercury, a frequent contaminant. We investigated associations of childhood fish consumption with learning and behavioral disorders in birth cohort study of the neurotoxic effects of early life exposure to solvent-contaminated drinking water. Childhood (age 7–12 years) fish consumption and learning and behavioral problems were reported in self-administered questionnaires (age 23–41 at questionnaire completion). Fish consumption was not meaningfully associated with repeating a grade, tutoring, attending summer school, special class placement, or low educational attainment. However, participants who ate fish several times a week had an elevated odds of Attention Deficit Disorder/Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (odds ratio: 5.2; 95% confidence interval: 1.5–18) compared to participants who did not eat fish. While these findings generally support the safety of the observed level of fish consumption, the absence of a beneficial effect may be attributed to insufficient fish intake or the choice of relatively low n-3 PUFA fish.

Keywords: ADD; ADHD; fish; learning disorders; methylmercury (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/11/1069/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/11/1069/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:11:p:1069-:d:82001

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-24
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:11:p:1069-:d:82001