EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Combined and Relative Effect Levels of Perceived Risk, Knowledge, Optimism, Pessimism, and Social Trust on Anxiety among Inhabitants Concerning Living on Heavy Metal Contaminated Soil

Zhongjun Tang, Zengli Guo, Li Zhou, Shengguo Xue, Qinfeng Zhu and Huike Zhu
Additional contact information
Zhongjun Tang: College of Economics and Administration, Beijing University of Technology, No. 100 Pingleyuan, Beijing 100124, China
Zengli Guo: College of Economics and Administration, Beijing University of Technology, No. 100 Pingleyuan, Beijing 100124, China
Li Zhou: Faculty of Business, University of Greenwich, London SE10 9LS, UK
Shengguo Xue: School of Metallurgy and Environment, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
Qinfeng Zhu: School of Business, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
Huike Zhu: College of Economics and Administration, Beijing University of Technology, No. 100 Pingleyuan, Beijing 100124, China

IJERPH, 2016, vol. 13, issue 11, 1-17

Abstract: This research aims at combined and relative effect levels on anxiety of: (1) perceived risk, knowledge, optimism, pessimism, and social trust; and (2) four sub-variables of social trust among inhabitants concerning living on heavy metal contaminated soil. On the basis of survey data from 499 Chinese respondents, results suggest that perceived risk, pessimism, optimism, and social trust have individual, significant, and direct effects on anxiety, while knowledge does not. Knowledge has significant, combined, and interactive effects on anxiety together with social trust and pessimism, respectively, but does not with perceived risk and optimism. Social trust, perceived risk, pessimism, knowledge, and optimism have significantly combined effects on anxiety; the five variables as a whole have stronger predictive values than each one individually. Anxiety is influenced firstly by social trust and secondly by perceived risk, pessimism, knowledge, and optimism. Each of four sub-variables of social trust has an individual, significant, and negative effect on anxiety. When introducing four sub-variables into one model, trust in social organizations and in the government have significantly combined effects on anxiety, while trust in experts and in friends and relatives do not; anxiety is influenced firstly by trust in social organization, and secondly by trust in the government.

Keywords: anxiety; contaminated soil; knowledge; optimism; perceived risk; social trust (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/11/1076/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/11/1076/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:11:p:1076-:d:81999

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-24
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:11:p:1076-:d:81999