From Punishment to Treatment: The “Clinical Alternative to Punitive Segregation” (CAPS) Program in New York City Jails

Sarah Glowa-Kollisch, Fatos Kaba, Anthony Waters, Y. Jude Leung, Elizabeth Ford and Homer Venters
Additional contact information
Sarah Glowa-Kollisch: Correctional Health Services, New York City Health + Hospitals, New York, NY 11101, USA
Fatos Kaba: Correctional Health Services, New York City Health + Hospitals, New York, NY 11101, USA
Anthony Waters: Correctional Health Services, New York City Health + Hospitals, New York, NY 11101, USA
Y. Jude Leung: Correctional Health Services, New York City Health + Hospitals, New York, NY 11101, USA
Elizabeth Ford: Correctional Health Services, New York City Health + Hospitals, New York, NY 11101, USA
Homer Venters: Correctional Health Services, New York City Health + Hospitals, New York, NY 11101, USA

IJERPH, 2016, vol. 13, issue 2, 1-10

Abstract: The proliferation of jails and prisons as places of institutionalization for persons with serious mental illness (SMI) has resulted in many of these patients receiving jail-based punishments, including solitary confinement. Starting in 2013, the New York City (NYC) jail system developed a new treatment unit for persons with SMI who were judged to have violated jail rules (and previously would have been punished with solitary confinement) called the Clinical Alternative to Punitive Segregation (CAPS) unit. CAPS is designed to offer a full range of therapeutic activities and interventions for these patients, including individual and group therapy, art therapy, medication counseling and community meetings. Each CAPS unit requires approximately $1.5 million more investment per year, largely in additional staff as compared to existing mental health units, and can house approximately 30 patients. Patients with less serious mental illness who received infractions were housed on units that combined solitary confinement with some clinical programming, called Restrictive Housing Units (RHU). Between 1 December 2013 and 31 March 2015, a total of 195 and 1433 patients passed through the CAPS and RHU units, respectively. A small cohort of patients experienced both CAPS and RHU ( n = 90). For these patients, their rates of self-harm and injury were significantly lower while on the CAPS unit than when on the RHU units. Improvements in clinical outcomes are possible for incarcerated patients with mental illness with investment in new alternatives to solitary confinement. We have started to adapt the CAPS approach to existing mental health units as a means to promote better clinical outcomes and also help prevent jail-based infractions. The cost of these programs and the dramatic differences in length of stay for patients who earn these jail-based infractions highlight the need for alternatives to incarceration, some of which have recently been announced in NYC.

Keywords: jail; solitary confinement; mental health; self-harm (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/2/182/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/2/182/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:2:p:182-:d:63266

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().