Assessment of Exposure to VOCs among Pregnant Women in the National Children’s Study

Elizabeth Barksdale Boyle, Susan M. Viet, David J. Wright, Lori S. Merrill, K. Udeni Alwis, Benjamin C. Blount, Mary E. Mortensen, John Moye and Michael Dellarco
Additional contact information
Elizabeth Barksdale Boyle: Health Studies, Westat, 1600 Research Blvd, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
Susan M. Viet: Health Studies, Westat, 1600 Research Blvd, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
David J. Wright: Health Studies, Westat, 1600 Research Blvd, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
Lori S. Merrill: Health Studies, Westat, 1600 Research Blvd, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
K. Udeni Alwis: Tobacco and Volatiles Branch, Division of Laboratory Sciences, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA
Benjamin C. Blount: Tobacco and Volatiles Branch, Division of Laboratory Sciences, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA
Mary E. Mortensen: Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA
John Moye: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
Michael Dellarco: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA

IJERPH, 2016, vol. 13, issue 4, 1-16

Abstract: Epidemiologic studies can measure exposure to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using environmental samples, biomarkers, questionnaires, or observations. These different exposure assessment approaches each have advantages and disadvantages; thus, evaluating relationships is an important consideration. In the National Children’s Vanguard Study from 2009 to 2010, participants completed questionnaires and data collectors observed VOC exposure sources and collected urine samples from 488 third trimester pregnant women at in-person study visits. From urine, we simultaneously quantified 28 VOC metabolites of exposure to acrolein, acrylamide, acrylonitrile, benzene, 1-bromopropane, 1,3-butadiene, carbon disulfide, crotonaldehyde, cyanide, N,N -dimethylformamide, ethylbenzene, ethylene oxide, propylene oxide, styrene, tetrachloroethylene, toluene, trichloroethylene, vinyl chloride, and xylene exposures using ultra high performance liquid chromatography coupled with an electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-ESI/MSMS) method. Urinary thiocyanate was measured using an ion chromatography coupled with an electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry method (IC-ESI/MSMS). We modeled the relationship between urinary VOC metabolite concentrations and sources of VOC exposure. Sources of exposure were assessed by participant report via questionnaire (use of air fresheners, aerosols, paint or varnish, organic solvents, and passive/active smoking) and by observations by a trained data collector (presence of scented products in homes). We found several significant ( p < 0.01) relationships between the urinary metabolites of VOCs and sources of VOC exposure. Smoking was positively associated with metabolites of the tobacco constituents acrolein, acrylamide, acrylonitrile, 1,3-butadiene, crotonaldehyde, cyanide, ethylene oxide, N,N -dimethylformamide, propylene oxide, styrene, and xylene. Study location was negatively associated with the toluene metabolite N -acetyl- S -(benzyl)- l -cysteine (BMA), and paint use was positively associated with the xylene metabolites 2-methylhippuric acid (2MHA) and 3-Methylhippuric acid & 4-methylhippuric acid (3MHA + 4MHA). A near-significant ( p = 0.06) relationship was observed between acrylamide metabolites and observation of incense.

Keywords: birth cohort study; pregnant women; tobacco; volatile organic compounds; urinary metabolites; National Children’s Study (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/4/376/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/4/376/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:4:p:376-:d:66663

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().