EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Assessing a New Method for Measuring Fetal Exposure to Mercury: Newborn Bloodspots

Jessica W. Nelson, Betsy L. Edhlund, Jean Johnson, Christina E. Rosebush, Zachary S. Holmquist, Shanna H. Swan and Ruby H. N. Nguyen
Additional contact information
Jessica W. Nelson: Environmental Tracking and Biomonitoring Program, Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, MN 55164, USA
Betsy L. Edhlund: Public Health Laboratory, Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, MN 55164, USA
Jean Johnson: Environmental Tracking and Biomonitoring Program, Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, MN 55164, USA
Christina E. Rosebush: Environmental Tracking and Biomonitoring Program, Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, MN 55164, USA
Zachary S. Holmquist: Division of Epidemiology & Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA
Shanna H. Swan: Department of Preventive Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
Ruby H. N. Nguyen: Division of Epidemiology & Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA

IJERPH, 2016, vol. 13, issue 7, 1-8

Abstract: Background: Measuring mercury in newborn bloodspots to determine fetal exposures is a novel methodology with many advantages. Questions remain, however, about its reliability as an estimate of newborn exposure to mercury. Methods: We studied mercury concentrations in paired bloodspots and cord blood from a convenience sample of 48 Minnesota women and infants. Results: The limit of detection for bloodspots was higher than for cord blood (0.7 and 0.3 ?g/L in bloodspots and cord blood, respectively) with the result that mercury was detected in only 38% of newborn bloodspots compared to 62% of cord blood samples. The geometric mean mercury concentration in cord blood was 0.6 ?g/L. Mercury concentrations were almost uniformly lower in bloodspots than in cord blood (mean ratio (±SD) = 0.85 ± 0.4), their mean value was significantly less than that for the cord blood ( p = 0.02), and the two methods were highly correlated ( r = 0.82). Conclusion: These preliminary findings indicate that newborn bloodspot mercury measurements have utility; however, until bloodspot analyses are more sensitive, they are likely to underestimate in utero exposure.

Keywords: mercury; biomonitoring; newborn bloodspots; cord blood; fetal exposure (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/7/692/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/7/692/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:7:p:692-:d:73630

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-24
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:7:p:692-:d:73630