EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Comparison of Metabolic Syndrome Indicators in Two Samples of Central and South Americans Living in the Washington, D.C. Area in 1993–1994 and 2008–2009: Secular Changes in Metabolic Syndrome in Hispanics

Regina Gill, Robert T. Jackson, Marguerite Duane, Allison Miner and Saira A. Khan
Additional contact information
Regina Gill: Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20740, USA
Robert T. Jackson: Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20740, USA
Marguerite Duane: Department of Family Science, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA
Allison Miner: Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20740, USA
Saira A. Khan: Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20740, USA

IJERPH, 2017, vol. 14, issue 8, 1-11

Abstract: The Central and South American populations are growing rapidly in the US; however, there is a paucity of information about their health status. Objectives : we estimated the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its individual components from two cohorts of Central and South Americans. Methods : This cross-sectional, medical record extraction survey sampled 1641 adults from a Washington, D.C clinic. A questionnaire was used to collect socio-demographic, medical history, anthropometric, biochemical, and clinical data. Results : among the 1993–1994 cohort, the MetS prevalence was 19.7%. The most prevalent MetS components were low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (40.4% men and 51.3% women), elevated triglycerides (40.9% men and 33.1% women), and high body mass index (BMI) ? 25 kg/m 2 (27.6% men and 36.6% women). The overall prevalence of MetS in the 2008–2009 cohort was 28%. The most common abnormal metabolic indicator was an elevated BMI ? 25 kg/m 2 (75.6%). 43.2% of men and 50.7% of women had HDL levels below normal, while the prevalence of hypertriglyceridemia was 46.5% and 32.5% for men and women, respectively. Conclusion : the prevalence of MetS was significantly greater in 2008–2009 compared with 1993–1994 ( p ? 0.05). Dyslipidemia and high BMI have increased. Although similar components were identified in both the 1993–1994 and 2008–2009 study populations, the risks of MetS have increased over time.

Keywords: central and South Americans adults; understudied groups; metabolic syndrome; obesity; heart disease; diabetes; epidemiology (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/8/881/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/8/881/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:8:p:881-:d:107102

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-24
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:8:p:881-:d:107102