On Consistency Test Method of Expert Opinion in Ecological Security Assessment
Zaiwu Gong and
Lihong Wang
Additional contact information
Zaiwu Gong: Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, College of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
Lihong Wang: Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, College of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
IJERPH, 2017, vol. 14, issue 9, 1-18
Abstract:
To reflect the initiative design and initiative of human security management and safety warning, ecological safety assessment is of great value. In the comprehensive evaluation of regional ecological security with the participation of experts, the expert’s individual judgment level, ability and the consistency of the expert’s overall opinion will have a very important influence on the evaluation result. This paper studies the consistency measure and consensus measure based on the multiplicative and additive consistency property of fuzzy preference relation (FPR). We firstly propose the optimization methods to obtain the optimal multiplicative consistent and additively consistent FPRs of individual and group judgments, respectively. Then, we put forward a consistency measure by computing the distance between the original individual judgment and the optimal individual estimation, along with a consensus measure by computing the distance between the original collective judgment and the optimal collective estimation. In the end, we make a case study on ecological security for five cities. Result shows that the optimal FPRs are helpful in measuring the consistency degree of individual judgment and the consensus degree of collective judgment.
Keywords: ecological security; sustainable development; group decision making; fuzzy preference relation; consensus measure (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/9/1012/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/9/1012/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:9:p:1012-:d:110825
Access Statistics for this article
IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu
More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().