EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Spatiotemporal Changes in PM 2.5 and Their Relationships with Land-Use and People in Hangzhou

Li Tian, Wei Hou, Jiquan Chen, Chaonan Chen and Xiaojun Pan
Additional contact information
Li Tian: Qianyanzhou Ecological Research Station, Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
Wei Hou: China Institute of Surveying and Mapping Science, Beijing 100830, China
Jiquan Chen: Department of Geography, Environment and Spatial Sciences and Center for Global Change and Earth Observations, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
Chaonan Chen: College of Environment and Planning, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
Xiaojun Pan: The Second Surveying and Mapping Institute of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310012, China

IJERPH, 2018, vol. 15, issue 10, 1-14

Abstract: Increases in the extent and level of air pollution in Chinese cities have become a major concern of the public and burden on the government. While ample literature has focused on the status, changes and causes of air pollution (particularly on PM 2.5 and PM 10 ), significantly less is known on their effects on people. In this study we used Hangzhou, China, as our testbed to assess the direct impact of PM 2.5 on youth populations that are more vulnerable to pollution. We used the ground monitoring data of air quality and Aerosol optical thickness (AOT) product from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) for the spatiotemporal changes of PM 2.5 by season in 2015. We further explored these distributions with land cover, population density and schools (kindergarten, primary school and middle school) to explore the potential impacts in seeking potential mitigation solutions. We found that the seasonal variation of PM 2.5 concentration was winter > spring > autumn > summer. In Hangzhou, the percentage of land area exposed to PM 2.5 > 50 µg m −3 accounted for 59.86% in winter, 56.62% in spring, 40.44% in autumn and 0% in summer, whereas these figures for PM 2.5 of <35 µg m −3 were 70.01%, 5.28%, 5.17%, 4.16% in summer, winter, autumn and spring, respectively. As for land cover, forest experienced PM 2.5 of 35–50 µg m −3 (i.e., lower than those of other cover types), likely due to the potential filtering and absorption function of the forests. More importantly, a quantitative index based on population-weighted exposure level ( pwel ) indicated that only 9.06% of the population lived in areas that met the national air quality standards. Only 1.66% (14,055) of infants and juveniles lived in areas with PM 2.5 of <35 µg m −3 . Considering the legacy effects of PM 2.5 over the long-term, we highly recommend improving the monitoring systems for both air quality and people (i.e., their health conditions), with special attention paid to infants and juveniles.

Keywords: PM 2.5; spatial and temporal variations; land use; infants and juveniles (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/10/2192/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/10/2192/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:10:p:2192-:d:174124

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:10:p:2192-:d:174124