EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Translation and Test–Retest of the Spanish Podiatry Health Questionnaire (PHQ-S)

Emmanuel Navarro-Flores, Marta Elena Losa-Iglesias, Ricardo Becerro- de-Bengoa-Vallejo, Daniel López-López, David Rodríguez-Sanz, Patricia Palomo-López and César Calvo-Lobo
Additional contact information
Emmanuel Navarro-Flores: Faculty of Nursing and Podiatry, Universidad de Valencia, 46010 València, Spain
Marta Elena Losa-Iglesias: Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28933 Móstoles, Spain
Ricardo Becerro- de-Bengoa-Vallejo: Facultad de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Daniel López-López: Research, Health and Podiatry Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Nursing and Podiatry, Universidade da Coruña, 15001 A Coruña, Spain
David Rodríguez-Sanz: Facultad de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Patricia Palomo-López: University Center of Plasencia, Universidad de Extremadura, 06071 Badajoz, Spain
César Calvo-Lobo: Nursing and Physical Therapy Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de León, 24071 León, Spain

IJERPH, 2018, vol. 15, issue 10, 1-11

Abstract: Background : The Podiatric Health Questionnaire (PHQ) is a health-related questionnaire consisting of six questions designed for measuring foot health status. To date, the PHQ has only been validated in the English-language version. Thus, this study aimed to perform the Spanish translation and test–retest procedures of the PHQ (PHQ-S). Method : The forward/backward translation and test–retest reliability methods were applied from English to Spanish languages. Regarding the total score for each domain, internal consistency and reliability were determined by the Cronbach α and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with a confidence interval (CI) of 95%. Results : High internal consistency was shown for the six domains: (1) walking with a Cronbach α of 0.97; (2) hygiene and nail care with 0.93 and 093, respectively; (3) foot pain with 0.91; (4) worry and concern domain with 0.904; (5) quality of life with 0.87; and (6) the self-perception of how their feet are feeling measured by a visual analogic scale with 0.92. Excellent test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.99 (95% CI = 0.96–0.98)) was shown for the total score. Conclusions : The PHQ-S was shown to be a valid and reliable tool for an acceptable use in the Spanish population.

Keywords: foot; quality of life; health impact assessment; validation studies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/10/2205/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/10/2205/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:10:p:2205-:d:174538

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:10:p:2205-:d:174538