Focusing on Coal Workers’ Lung Diseases: A Comparative Analysis of China, Australia, and the United States

Shuai Han, Hong Chen, Maggie-Anne Harvey, Eric Stemn and David Cliff
Additional contact information
Shuai Han: School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China
Hong Chen: School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China
Maggie-Anne Harvey: Sustainable Minerals Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia
Eric Stemn: Sustainable Minerals Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia
David Cliff: Sustainable Minerals Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia

IJERPH, 2018, vol. 15, issue 11, 1-26

Abstract: China has high and increasing annual rates of occupational lung diseases such as pneumoconiosis and silicosis. In contrast, Australia and the United States of America (USA) have greatly lowered their annual rates of lung diseases since the 1970s. This paper systematically compared and analysed the multi-elements of coal dust management and health management in these three countries to provide a reference for China. Regarding coal dust management, this paper found that coal workers in China are more susceptible to lung diseases compared to workers in the USA and Australia, considering fundamental aspects such as mine type, coal rank, and geological conditions. In addition, the controllable aspects such as advanced mitigation, monitoring methods, and the personal protective equipment of coal dust were relatively inadequate in China compared to the USA and Australia. Health management in China was found to have multiple deficiencies in health examination, co-governance, and compensations for coal workers suffering from lung diseases and healthcare for retired coal workers. These deficiencies may be attributed to insufficient medical resources, the Chinese government-dominated governance, ineffective procedures for obtaining compensation, and the lack of effective and preventive healthcare programs for the retired coal workers. Based on the USA and Australia experience, some suggestions for improvement were proposed.

Keywords: lung diseases; coal dust; monitor; compensation; governance; public health (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/11/2565/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/11/2565/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:11:p:2565-:d:183292

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().