EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Removing Organic Matter and Nutrients from Pig Farm Wastewater with a Constructed Wetland System

Celia De La Mora-Orozco, Irma Julieta González-Acuña, Ruben Alfonso Saucedo-Terán, Hugo Ernesto Flores-López, Hector Osbaldo Rubio-Arias and Jesús Manuel Ochoa-Rivero
Additional contact information
Celia De La Mora-Orozco: National Research Institute for Forestry, Agriculture and Animal Production, Av. Biodiversidad 2470, Tepatitlán de Morelos 47600, Jalisco, Mexico
Irma Julieta González-Acuña: National Research Institute for Forestry, Agriculture and Animal Production, Km 6 Entronque Carretera Internacional Mexico-Nogales, Santiago Ixcuintla 63300, Nayarit, Mexico
Ruben Alfonso Saucedo-Terán: Retired, Former Researcher from the National Research Institute for Forestry, Agriculture and Animal Production, Aldama Chihuahua 27440, Mexico
Hugo Ernesto Flores-López: National Research Institute for Forestry, Agriculture and Animal Production, Av. Biodiversidad 2470, Tepatitlán de Morelos 47600, Jalisco, Mexico
Hector Osbaldo Rubio-Arias: Department of Natural Resources, Autonomous University of Chihuahua, Mexico. Periférico Francisco R. Almada, Km. 1. Facultad de Zootecnia, Chihuahua 33820, Mexico
Jesús Manuel Ochoa-Rivero: National Research Institute for Forestry, Agriculture and Animal Production, Km. 33.3 Carr. Chihuahua-Ojinaga, Cd. Aldama, Chihuahua 27440, Mexico

IJERPH, 2018, vol. 15, issue 5, 1-16

Abstract: Pollutants from pig farms in Mexico have caused problems in many surface water reservoirs. Growing concern has driven the search for low-cost wastewater treatment solutions. The objective of this research was to evaluate the potential of an in-series constructed wetland to remove nutrients from wastewater from a pig farm. The wetland system had a horizontal flow that consisted of three cells, the first a surface water wetland, the second a sedimentation cell, and the third a subsurface flow wetland. The vegetation used was Thypa sp. and Scirpus sp. A mix of soil with red volcanic rock (10–30 mm diameter) and yellow sand (2–8 mm diameter) was used as a substrate for the vegetation. The experiments were carried out in duplicate. Water samples were collected at the inflow and outflow of the cells. Two hydraulic retention times (HRT) (5 and 10 days) and three treatments were evaluated: 400, 800, and 1200 mg·L −1 of chemical oxygen demand (COD) concentration. Data was collected in situ for temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), electrical conductivity (EC), and total dissolved solids (TDS). COD, total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), ammonia nitrogen (NH 3 –N), and total phosphorous (TP) were analyzed in the laboratory. The results showed that the in-series constructed wetland is a feasible system for nutrient pollutant removal, with COD removal efficiency of 76% and 80% mg·L −1 for a 5- and 10-day HRT, respectively. The removal efficiency for TKN, NH 3 –N, and TP reached about 70% with a 5-day HRT, while a removal of 85% was obtained with a 10-day HRT. The wetland reached the maximum removal efficiency with a 10-day HRT and an inflow load of 400 mg·L −1 of organic matter. The results indicate that HRT positively affects removal efficiency of COD and TDS. On the other hand, the HRT was not the determining factor for TP removal. Treatment one, with an initial COD concentration of 400 mg·L −1 , had the highest removal of the assessed pollutants, allowing for the use of water for irrigation according to Mexican regulatory standards (NOM-001). The water quality resulting from treatments two and three (T2 = 800 mg·L −1 of COD and T3 = 1200 mg·L −1 of COD) did not comply with minimal requirements for irrigation water.

Keywords: pig farm wastewater; organic matter; nutrient removal; surface and subsurface wetland (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/5/1031/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/5/1031/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:5:p:1031-:d:148058

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:5:p:1031-:d:148058