Asthma among World Trade Center First Responders: A Qualitative Synthesis and Bias Assessment

Hyun Kim, Navneet Kaur Baidwan, David Kriebel, Manuel Cifuentes and Sherry Baron
Additional contact information
Hyun Kim: Division of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
Navneet Kaur Baidwan: Division of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
David Kriebel: Department of Public Health, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA 01854, USA
Manuel Cifuentes: Department of Public Health, Regis College, Weston, MA 02493, USA
Sherry Baron: Barry Commoner Center for Health & the Environment, Queens College, New York, NY 11367, USA

IJERPH, 2018, vol. 15, issue 6, 1-14

Abstract: The World Trade Center (WTC) disaster exposed the responders to several hazards. Three cohorts i.e., the Fire Department of New York (FDNY), the General Responder Cohort (GRC), and the WTC Health Registry (WTCHR) surveyed the exposed responder population. We searched Pubmed and Web of Science for literature on a well-published association between the WTC exposures and asthma, focusing on new-onset self-reported physician-diagnosed asthma. The resulting five articles were qualitatively assessed for potential biases. These papers were independently reviewed by the co-authors, and conclusions were derived after discussions. While, the cohorts had well-defined eligibility criteria, they lacked information about the entire exposed population. We conclude that selection and surveillance biases may have occurred in the GRC and WTCHR cohorts, but were likely to have been minimal in the FDNY cohort. Health care benefits available to responders may have increased the reporting of both exposure and outcome in the former, and decreased outcome reporting in the FDNY cohort. Irrespective of the biases, the studies showed similar findings, confirming the association between WTC exposure and self-reported physician-diagnosed asthma among responders. This suggests that health data gathered under great duress and for purposes other than epidemiology can yield sound conclusions. Potential biases can, however, be minimized by having validated survey instruments and worker registries in place before events occur.

Keywords: world trade center; responders; new-onset asthma; bias analysis; review (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/6/1053/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/6/1053/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:6:p:1053-:d:148515

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().