Improvement of Eco-Efficiency in China: A Comparison of Mandatory and Hybrid Environmental Policy Instruments
Zifeng Liang,
Manli Zhang,
Qingduo Mao,
Bingxin Yu and
Ben Ma
Additional contact information
Zifeng Liang: Political Science and Public Administration School, Shandong University, Qingdao 266000, China
Manli Zhang: Political Science and Public Administration School, Shandong University, Qingdao 266000, China
Qingduo Mao: Political Science and Public Administration School, Shandong University, Qingdao 266000, China
Bingxin Yu: Political Science and Public Administration School, Shandong University, Qingdao 266000, China
Ben Ma: Political Science and Public Administration School, Shandong University, Qingdao 266000, China
IJERPH, 2018, vol. 15, issue 7, 1-20
Abstract:
China’s environmental problems have long been criticized. The Communist Party of China (CPC) and the government have increasingly paid attention to developing environmental protection and included the construction of an ecological civilization in the “Five-in-One” development strategy. The improvement of regional eco-efficiency is an important way to realize the coordinated development of the entire society, and environmental policy instruments are a powerful means to enhance regional eco-efficiency. This paper categorizes environmental policy instruments into mandatory, hybrid, and voluntary types. Based on panel data from 31 provinces in China from 2005 to 2015, the paper discusses the impact of environmental policy instruments on regional eco-efficiency and the means of the impact. The research shows that (1) mandatory and hybrid environmental policy instruments play a significant role in promoting regional eco-efficiency, while the role of voluntary instruments is not significant in promoting regional eco-efficiency; (2) hybrid and mandatory environmental policy instruments have negative interactions; and (3) the level of economic development will positively affect the role of hybrid environmental policy instruments in promoting regional eco-efficiency but negatively affect the role of mandatory instruments in promoting regional efficiency.
Keywords: eco-efficiency; mandatory environmental policy instruments; hybrid environmental policy instruments; voluntary environmental policy instruments (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/7/1473/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/7/1473/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:7:p:1473-:d:157593
Access Statistics for this article
IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu
More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().