Analysis of the Characteristics and Sources of Carbonaceous Aerosols in PM 2.5 in the Beijing, Tianjin, and Langfang Region, China

Mengxi Qi, Lei Jiang, Yixuan Liu, Qiulin Xiong, Chunyuan Sun, Xing Li, Wenji Zhao and Xingchuan Yang
Additional contact information
Mengxi Qi: Beijing Key Laboratory of Resources Environment and Geographic Information System, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China
Lei Jiang: Beijing Municipal Research Institute of Environmental Protection, Beijing 100037, China
Yixuan Liu: Beijing Key Laboratory of Resources Environment and Geographic Information System, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China
Qiulin Xiong: Beijing Key Laboratory of Resources Environment and Geographic Information System, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China
Chunyuan Sun: Beijing Key Laboratory of Resources Environment and Geographic Information System, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China
Xing Li: Beijing Key Laboratory of Resources Environment and Geographic Information System, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China
Wenji Zhao: Beijing Key Laboratory of Resources Environment and Geographic Information System, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China
Xingchuan Yang: Beijing Key Laboratory of Resources Environment and Geographic Information System, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China

IJERPH, 2018, vol. 15, issue 7, 1-14

Abstract: PM 2.5 samples from Beijing, Tianjin, and Langfang were simultaneously collected from 20 November 2016 to 25 December 2016, and the organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) content in the samples were measured and analyzed. The pollution characteristics and sources of OC and EC in atmospheric PM 2.5 for three adjacent cities were discussed. The average mass concentrations of OC in PM 2.5 in Beijing, Tianjin, and Langfang were 27.93 ± 23.35 μg/m 3 , 25.27 ± 12.43 μg/m 3 , and 52.75 ± 37.97 μg/m 3 , respectively, and the mean mass concentrations of EC were 6.61 ± 5.13 μg/m 3 , 6.14 ± 2.84 μg/m 3 , and 12.06 ± 6.81 μg/m 3 , respectively. The average mass concentration of total carbon (TC) accounted for 30.5%, 24.8%, and 49% of the average mass concentration of PM 2.5 in the atmosphere. The total carbonaceous matter (TCA) in Beijing, Tianjin, and Langfang was 51.29, 46.57, and 96.45 μg/m 3 , respectively. The TCA was the main component of PM 2.5 in the region. The correlation between OC and EC in the three cities showed R 2 values of 0.882, 0.633, and 0.784 for Beijing, Tianjin, and Langfang, respectively, indicating that the sources of urban carbonaceous aerosols had good consistency and stability. The OC/EC values of the three sampling points were 4.48 ± 1.45, 4.42 ± 1.77, and 4.22 ± 1.29, respectively, considerably greater than 2, indicating that the main sources of pollution were automobile exhaust, and the combustion of coal and biomass. The OC/EC minimum ratio method was used to estimate the secondary organic carbon (SOC) content in Beijing, Tianjin and Langfang. Their values were 10.73, 10.71, and 19.51, respectively, which accounted for 38%, 42%, and 37% of the average OC concentration in each city, respectively. The analysis of the eight carbon components showed that the main sources of pollutants in Beijing, Tianjin, and Langfang were exhaust emissions from gasoline vehicles, but the combustion of coal and biomass was relatively low. The pollution of road dust was more serious in Tianjin than in Beijing and Langfang. The contribution of biomass burning and coal-burning pollution sources to atmospheric carbon aerosols in Langfang was more prominent than that of Beijing and Tianjin.

Keywords: carbonaceous aerosols; PM 2.5; organic carbon; elemental carbon; source analyses (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/7/1483/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/7/1483/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:7:p:1483-:d:157751

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().