Relations between Objective and Perceived Built Environments and the Modifying Role of Individual Socioeconomic Position. A Cross-Sectional Study on Traffic Noise and Urban Green Space in a Large German City

Steffen Andreas Schüle, Sarah Nanninga, Stefanie Dreger and Gabriele Bolte
Additional contact information
Steffen Andreas Schüle: University of Bremen, Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, Department of Social Epidemiology, 28359 Bremen, Germany
Sarah Nanninga: University of Bremen, Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, Department of Social Epidemiology, 28359 Bremen, Germany
Stefanie Dreger: University of Bremen, Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, Department of Social Epidemiology, 28359 Bremen, Germany
Gabriele Bolte: University of Bremen, Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, Department of Social Epidemiology, 28359 Bremen, Germany

IJERPH, 2018, vol. 15, issue 8, 1-13

Abstract: Perceived annoyance due to traffic noise and lack of urban green space is mostly determined using data from self-administered questionnaires. However, there is still no clear evidence to what extent such perceived measures are related to objectively assessed environmental data and whether socioeconomic dimensions modify such relationships. In a cross-sectional study in Dortmund, Germany, georeferenced home addresses from parents with preschool aged children were used to analyse relations between exposures to objectively measured green space and traffic noise and subjective annoyance due to noise and lack of green space with the additional consideration of socioeconomic characteristics as effect modifiers. Higher perceived annoyance correlated with higher objectively measured traffic noise and lower objectively measured green, respectively. Stratified logistic regression models indicated a modifying role of socioeconomic characteristics. The strengths of associations between objectively measured environmental exposures and perceived annoyance differed by socioeconomic strata. Especially for noise, odds ratios were higher in low socioeconomic strata than in high socioeconomic strata. Therefore, using objective measures of the built environment as a proxy for individual perception should be made with caution as negative relations between objectively assessed built environments and health could be underestimated when considering individual socioeconomic position only as a confounder.

Keywords: environmental inequalities; environmental health inequalities; vulnerability; built environment; noise; green space (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/8/1562/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/8/1562/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:8:p:1562-:d:159615

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().