EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Does a Classroom Standing Desk Intervention Modify Standing and Sitting Behaviour and Musculoskeletal Symptoms during School Time and Physical Activity during Waking Time?

Jolyn Ee, Sharon Parry, Beatriz IR de Oliveira, Joanne A. McVeigh, Erin Howie and Leon Straker
Additional contact information
Jolyn Ee: Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, Perth 6102, Western Australia, Australia
Sharon Parry: Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, Perth 6102, Western Australia, Australia
Beatriz IR de Oliveira: Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, Perth 6102, Western Australia, Australia
Joanne A. McVeigh: Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, Perth 6102, Western Australia, Australia
Erin Howie: Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, Perth 6102, Western Australia, Australia
Leon Straker: Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, Perth 6102, Western Australia, Australia

IJERPH, 2018, vol. 15, issue 8, 1-13

Abstract: Children are increasingly spending more time sedentary at school and during leisure time. This study examined the effects of a standing desk intervention in a classroom on children’s standing and sitting time at school, sedentary and physical activity levels throughout the day (waking hours), and musculoskeletal discomfort. A within-subjects crossover study design was used. Participants used either a standing desk or traditional seated desk for 21 days before swapping desks for another 21 days. Accelerometry and musculoskeletal discomfort data were collected during the last seven days of each 21-day period. Mixed models were used to analyse accelerometry data. Zero-inflated regression models and logistic regression models were used to analyse discomfort data. Forty-seven male students (aged 10–11 years) participated in the study. Standing time was 21 min/school day higher ( p < 0.001) and sitting time was 24 min/school day lower ( p = 0.003) when standing desks were used. No significant differences were found in sedentary and physical activity time during waking hours between the standing desk and seated desk conditions. Students were less likely to report musculoskeletal discomfort in the neck, shoulder, elbows and lower back when using standing desks (OR 0.52–0.74). Standing desks significantly increased classroom standing time and decreased musculoskeletal discomfort reports but had no overall effect on daily physical activity levels. Schools should consider moving towards classrooms enabling a variety of postures to potentially improve the long-term health of children.

Keywords: sedentary behaviour; standing desks; physical activity; musculoskeletal discomfort; children (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/8/1668/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/8/1668/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:8:p:1668-:d:162236

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:8:p:1668-:d:162236