EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Grief and Avoidant Death Attitudes Combine to Predict the Fading Affect Bias

Jeffrey A. Gibbons, Sherman A. Lee, Ashley M.A. Fehr, Kalli J. Wilson and Timothy R. Marshall
Additional contact information
Jeffrey A. Gibbons: Department of Psychology, Christopher Newport University, 1 Avenue of the Arts, Newport News, VA 23606, USA
Sherman A. Lee: Department of Psychology, Christopher Newport University, 1 Avenue of the Arts, Newport News, VA 23606, USA
Ashley M.A. Fehr: Department of Psychology, Old Dominion University, 5115 Hampton Blvd, Norfolk, VA 23529, USA
Kalli J. Wilson: Department of Psychology, Christopher Newport University, 1 Avenue of the Arts, Newport News, VA 23606, USA
Timothy R. Marshall: Department of Psychology, Christopher Newport University, 1 Avenue of the Arts, Newport News, VA 23606, USA

IJERPH, 2018, vol. 15, issue 8, 1-19

Abstract: The fading affect bias (FAB) occurs when unpleasant affect fades faster than pleasant affect. To detect mechanisms that influence the FAB in the context of death, we measured neuroticism, depression, anxiety, negative religious coping, death attitudes, and complicated grief as potential predictors of FAB for unpleasant/death and pleasant events at 2 points in time. The FAB was robust across older and newer events, which supported the mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Unexpectedly, complicated grief positively predicted FAB, and death avoidant attitudes moderated this relation, such that the Initial Event Affect by Grief interaction was only significant at the highest 3 quintiles of death avoidant attitudes. These results were likely due to moderate grief ratings, which were, along with avoidant death attitudes, related to healthy outcomes in past research. These results implicate complicated grief and death avoidant attitudes as resiliency mechanisms that are mobilized during bereavement to minimize its unpleasant effects.

Keywords: fading affect bias; complicated grief; death attitudes (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/8/1736/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/8/1736/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:8:p:1736-:d:163512

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:8:p:1736-:d:163512