Vape Club: Exploring Non-Profit Regulatory Models for the Supply of Vaporised Nicotine Products

Coral Gartner, Marilyn Bromberg, Tanya Musgrove and Kathy Luong
Additional contact information
Coral Gartner: School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4006, Australia
Marilyn Bromberg: Law School, University of Western Australia, Perth 6009, Australia
Tanya Musgrove: Law School, University of Western Australia, Perth 6009, Australia
Kathy Luong: School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4006, Australia

IJERPH, 2018, vol. 15, issue 8, 1-13

Abstract: Vaporised nicotine products (VNPs) that are not approved as therapeutic goods are banned in some countries, including Australia, Singapore, and Thailand. We reviewed two non-profit regulatory options, private clubs and the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration Special Access Scheme (SAS) that have been applied to other controlled substances (such as cannabis) as a potential model for regulating VNPs as an alternative to prohibition. The legal status of private cannabis clubs varies between the United States, Canada, Belgium, Spain, and Uruguay. Legal frameworks exist for cannabis clubs in some countries, but most operate in a legal grey area. Kava social clubs existed in the Northern Territory, Australia, until the federal government banned importation of kava. Access to medical cannabis in Australia is allowed as an unapproved therapeutic good via the SAS. In Australia, the SAS Category C appears to be the most feasible option to widen access to VNPs, but it may have limited acceptability to vapers and smokers. The private club model would require new legislation but could be potentially more acceptable if clubs were permitted to operate outside a medical framework. Consumer and regulator support for these models is currently unknown. Without similar restrictions applied to smoked tobacco products, these models may have only a limited impact on smoking prevalence. Further research could explore whether these models could be options for regulating smoked tobacco products.

Keywords: e-cigarettes; nicotine; non-profit model; cannabis social club; medical cannabis; kava; tobacco (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/8/1744/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/8/1744/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:8:p:1744-:d:163628

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().