EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Vibration and Noise Transmitted by Agricultural Backpack Powered Machines Critically Examined Using the Current Standards

Angela Calvo, Christian Preti, Maria Caria and Roberto Deboli
Additional contact information
Angela Calvo: DISAFA (Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences and Technologies), Largo P. Braccini 2, 10095 Turin, Italy
Christian Preti: IMAMOTER Institute for Agricultural and Earth-moving Machines of C.N.R (Italian National Research Council), Strada delle Cacce 73, 10135 Turin, Italy
Maria Caria: Dipartimento di Ingegneria del Territorio, Sezione di Meccanizzazione e Impiantistica, Viale Italia 39, 07100 Sassari, Italy
Roberto Deboli: IMAMOTER Institute for Agricultural and Earth-moving Machines of C.N.R (Italian National Research Council), Strada delle Cacce 73, 10135 Turin, Italy

IJERPH, 2019, vol. 16, issue 12, 1-20

Abstract: European Directives 2002/44/EC and 2003/10/EC establish the exposure limit values for preventing operators’ risks to vibration and noise transmitted by machines. Few studies studied noise and vibration of agricultural backpack powered machines (as mist blowers and blowers), but nobody critically studied them. This work analyzed the field back vibration, hand-arm vibration (HAV), and noise transmitted to ten operators by eight blowers and mist blowers. Unweighted and weighted vibration were analyzed, using the standards ISO 2631-1 (back), and ISO 5349-1 and ISO/TR 18570 (hand-arm system). The noise was evaluated by recording the acoustic pressure level at the operators’ ears using the ISO 9612. With the ISO 2631-1, the vibration to the operators’ back was low (0.38 ms −2 ), but the unweighted vibration measured along y and z -axes (not used by the ISO 2631-1) were high (>11 ms −2 ). HAV were also low when using the ISO 5349-1 (the highest value was 2.51 ms −2 in mist blowers), but high with the ISO/TR 18570 for the onset of vibration white finger (1446 ms −1.5 in blowers). Noise levels were always high: more than 100 dB(A), excluding the blower with the exhaust inside the blower hose. This last machine had noise levels lower than 86 dB(A), but its specific feature could increase environmental pollution.

Keywords: vibration; noise; blower; mist blower (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/12/2210/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/12/2210/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:12:p:2210-:d:242089

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:12:p:2210-:d:242089